today:
91
yesterday:
242
Total:
1,004,249

Articles about Careers

PRESS RELEASE
11-23-09

 

우리가 흔히 가서 먹는 Pancake House IHOP의 EEOC Sexual Harassment Case입니다.

10대의 2명의 Waitress들과 Assistant  Manager사이에서 발생된 건으로, 희생자의 complaint 가 충분하지 않았던 case 였지만, 이를 근거로 terminate되었던 waitress는 벌과금조로 $100,000의 배상금과 $4000의 보상액이 정해졌고, 이 사건에 비하여 미미하였던 다른 한명에게는 $1000의 보상액이 최종판결로 나왔습니다. 2006년도에 발생되어 claim이 들어와서 3여년이 걸쳐 치열하게 싸운 결과,  2009년 11월에 최종 판결이 나왔지만, IHOP이 Appeal를 결정했기 때문에, 또 얼마나 오랜시간 더 기나긴 법적공방을 계속할지는 모르겠습니다.

 

이상의 Case와 마찬가지로, 일단 법적 소송건으로 번진다면, 이로 인한 변호사 비용, 각종 court에 끌려 다녀야 하는 시간들, 회사의 이미지 실추등, 여러가지 많은 요인들을 생각한다면, 보다 철저한 준비와 실행, complaint가 들어왔을때 얼마나 철저하게 신속하게 해결해 주느냐가 관점이라고 하겠습니다.

 

유비무환!! 잘 준비하시어 크고작은 법적소송에서 벗어나심으로, 정말 중요한 기업으로서의 이윤 활동에 전념하시어 꼭 성공하시기를 바랍니다.

Federal Jury Awards $105,000 in EEOC Sexual Harassment Case Against Racine IHOP

Verdict for Federal Agency on Behalf of Two Teenaged Servers Who Were Verbally and Physically Harassed

MILWAUKEE – The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced today that a federal jury in Milwaukee has returned a $105,000 verdict following a four-day sexual harassment trial in a sexual harassment case brought by the agency.

The jury’s verdict awarded an aggregate of $5,000 to two teenagers who worked at a Racine, Wis., IHOP restaurant who, the EEOC alleged, were sexually harassed by their assistant manager, who subjected them to sexual propositions, groping and hair-pulling. In addition, the jury found that the IHOP had acted recklessly with respect to one of the servers and awarded her $100,000 in punitive damages. The EEOC said that punitive damages may be awarded by juries to punish such conduct and to discourage it in the future.

The IHOP at which the servers worked, and where they were harassed, was owned by Salauddin Janmohammed, and managed by a management consulting firm, Flipmeastack, owned by his wife. In defending the case, the IHOP contended that the restaurant had a strong policy against sexual harassment and that the victim’s complaints about the harassment were not sufficient -- defenses which the jury apparently rejected.

The case, captioned EEOC v. Management Hospitality of Racine, Inc.; Flipmeastack, Inc. and Salauddin Janmohammed, E.D. Wis. No. 06-C-0715, was filed by the EEOC in 2006, and presided over by Judge Lynn Adelman. Management Hospitality of Racine was one of approximately 20 IHOP restaurants located in Wisconsin, Illinois and Iowa owned by Janmohammed, and managed by Flipmeastack. The jury returned its verdict on Thursday, November 19.

The EEOC was represented at trial by Trial Attorneys Brain Tyndall of Milwaukee and Nicholas Pladson of Minneapolis, under the supervision of EEOC Chicago District Associate Regional Attorney Jean Kamp.

Regional Attorney John C. Hendrickson of the EEOC’s Chicago District said, “The trial and the verdict in this case should send a couple of very clear signals. The first is that, although the EEOC resolves many cases by consent decree, we are always ready to take cases to trial. The second is that when we do take sexual harassment cases to trial, juries do not shy away from requiring employers to pay large damage awards.”

EEOC Senior Trial Attorney Brian Tyndall added, “We’re proud to have worked with the two women in this case, who were teenagers at the time of the harassment. It’s never easy to stand up in the face or harassment, especially if you’re young and you really need your job. Nor is it easy to go through the rigors of litigation for a period of years. But these women did that, and because of them and this case, women will have more equal opportunity while working at IHOP and elsewhere in the restaurant industry in Wisconsin.”

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the EEOC is available on the agency’s web site at www.eeoc.gov.

The EEOC Chicago District Office is responsible for processing charges of discrimination, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litigation in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and North and South Dakota, with Area Offices in Milwaukee and Minneapolis.

 

Resources: http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/11-23-09.cfm

No. Subject Date Views
131 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 674
130 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 669
129 California Overtime Violations FAQ - what if work overtime without permission? 2012.07.07 666
128 California Overtime Violations FAQ - I supervise 2 people. Does that mean I fit into the Executive Exemption? 2012.07.07 666
127 California Overtime Violations FAQ - I'm a truck driver. Does that mean I an exempt? 2012.07.07 665
126 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 660
125 Hiring Interview할때 범하기 쉬운 5가지 실수 2011.12.26 658
124 Travel Time Policy - 출장비를 어떻게 계산해서 지급해야 될까요? 2012.01.22 658
123 NY State - New Release - effective 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 655
122 California Overtime Violations FAQ - California Overtime Violations FAQ 2012.07.07 653
121 Overtime 수당은 누가 언제 받을 수 있을까요? 2011.11.27 651
120 Interview Question-Candidates may be asked - 인터뷰시 물어봐도 되는 질문들 2011.12.26 650
119 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 646
118 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 644
117 Email Etiquette and Protocol 2012.06.21 642
116 Interview Question-Candidates should not be asked - 인터뷰시 하면 안되는 질문들!! 2011.12.26 641
115 California Overtime Violations FAQ - Why do I need an attorney when I can just file an overtime claim with The California Labor Commission? 2012.07.07 640
114 California Overtime Violations FAQ - I think my employer will retaliate against me if I file a wage claim for unpaid overtime. What can I do? 2012.07.07 640
113 Severance Agreement? 해고를 당하실때 Severance Agreement를 받으셨습니까? 2011.12.08 639
112 California Overtime Violations FAQ - How long does it take to get an Overtime Court Case? 2012.07.07 638
111 THE CHARACTERISTICS of A GOOD LEADER 2012.03.10 628
110 Employee Benefits in US provided by DOL Bureau of Labor Statistics 2011.11.30 625
109 Business Expenses의 지급에 대한 알아두면 좋은 상식 2012.03.31 625
108 EEOC’s Definition of Sexual Harassment 2011.12.27 622
107 California Overtime Violations FAQ - Alternate Work Week? 2012.07.07 621
106 California Overtime Violations FAQ - how long does it take to get paid overtime? 2012.07.07 621
105 Meeting Protocol and Integrity 2012.06.04 616
104 Sexual Harassment- Complaint Procedures 2011.12.31 615
103 Best Practices for Limiting Employer Liability (가장중요한 대책들입니다.) 2012.01.02 615
102 Sexual Harassment- Key Elements of Investigation Procedures 2011.12.31 613
101 SB 459: Penalties for employers who misclassify employees as independent contractors. 2011.12.18 612
100 Wage - Time Clock Payment 에 관한 알아두면 좋은 상식 2012.03.31 612
99 How to apply UI in CA 갑자기 직장을 잃게 되었을 경우, 어떻게 도움을 받을수 있을까? 2011.11.20 611
98 Rest Break Compliance 2012.03.31 609
97 Examples of Conduct that May be Unlawful 2011.12.28 607
96 California Overtime Violations FAQ - Can my employer require me to work overtime? 2012.07.07 605
95 California Overtime Violations FAQ - I don't supervise anyone. How can I determine whether I have been misclassified as exempt? 2012.07.07 605
94 Employee vs. Independent Contractor – Seven Tips for Business Owners 2011.12.18 604
93 California Overtime Violations FAQ - How much will a California Labor Law Attorney Cost? 2012.07.07 604
92 Travel Time Policy - 노동청의 규정은 어떻게 되어 있을까요? 2012.01.22 603
91 Liability and Relationships - Office Relationships-Supervisors & Subordinates 2011.12.28 602
90 Employers must post the employee notice 10 days before a statewide election - form attached 2012.07.07 599
89 FSA Worksheet - how to save the tax as an Employer and/or an Employee 2011.12.22 593
88 About OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) 2011.12.24 584
87 Travel Time Policy - good example 3 - League of Minessota Cities 2012.01.22 584
86 Office Refrigerator Etiquette 2012.07.01 581
85 U.S. offers tips on avoiding overtime pay 2012.07.07 581
84 What is Wage Order? California Wage Orders for 2001 - 2007 and Beyond 2012.02.22 580
83 Travel Time Policy - good example 1 - may be good for your company too. 2012.01.22 578
82 Investigation Interview Protocol for Employee Interview 2011.12.31 573