today:
114
yesterday:
242
Total:
1,004,272

Articles about Careers

Egg Giant National Food to Pay $650,000 To Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

Employer Failed to Stop Supervisor's Sexual Demands, Retaliated Against Workers Who Spoke Out, Federal Agency Charged

SEATTLE - National Food Corporation, a major supplier of eggs to the Pacific Northwestern and Midwestern United States and East Asia with headquarters in Everett, Wash., will pay $650,000 to five workers and provide other relief to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.

The EEOC's suit charged that a supervisor at National Food's egg farm in Lind, Wash., repeatedly demanded sexual favors from a female laborer, who worked alone in a henhouse, in order to keep her job. Taking advantage of her isolated workplace, the supervisor would physically grab the barn worker and demand sex from her on a weekly basis, from 2003 to 2010. The EEOC also alleged that when her co-workers raised complaints about sexual harassment to company management, they were fired or forced out of their jobs.

"For almost seven years, I tried to just survive these demands from my boss, because I needed to support my mother and my daughter," said the worker. "I hope my case will help other workers to speak out against sexual harassment. It's important to know that that you have a right to say no to sexual demands even from a supervisor, and that the law protects you when you protest harassment."

Sexual harassment violates Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC filed the lawsuit (EEOC v. National Food Corp., CV-12-00550-TOR.) in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, after an investigation conducted by EEOC investigator Richard Hernandez, and first attempting to reach voluntary settlement out of court. The workers were also represented by private counsel from Columbia Legal Services and MacDonald Hogue & Bayless.

"This lawsuit is another in an unfortunate pattern of employers taking advantage of female agricultural workers who often work in isolation and are unaware of their rights," said David Lopez, general counsel of the EEOC. "It is one of the EEOC's national priorities to combat discrimination against vulnerable workers, and we hope that this settlement sends a message to other employers that they need to be vigilant to prevent sexual harassment and other abuse."

Under the consent decree resolving this lawsuit, National Food has also agreed to issue EEO policies in English and Spanish to employees throughout Eastern Washington and South Dakota; institute changes to ensure that its complaint procedures are accessible; and train its management and to hold supervisors accountable for any discrimination, harassment or retaliation under their watch. In addition, National Foods will report harassment complaints to the EEOC for four years, and will not rehire the alleged harasser in any capacity.

"All workers have the right to a workplace free of harassment," said EEOC San Francisco Regional Attorney William R. Tamayo, whose office has jurisdiction over Washington State. "We are glad that National Foods worked with the Commission to reach this resolution without going through lengthy and costly litigation. The settlement will provide significant relief for individuals EEOC believes were victims of egregious harassment and retaliation. The changes in company practices and the discharge of the harasser will hopefully create a safe place for employees."

"Abuse of power should not occur in the workplace, whether in a white-collar office or on an isolated farm," said Michael Baldonado, director of the EEOC's San Francisco District Office. "The steps that National Food has agreed to should send a clear message that sexual harassment and retaliation will not be tolerated."

This case fits within two of the six national priorities identified by the Commission's Strategic Enforcement Plan (SEP): protecting vulnerable workers who may be less familiar with their rights under equal employment laws, and addressing workplace harassment through systemic enforcement and targeted outreach.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Additional information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.

 

http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/5-16-13.cfm

No. Subject Date Views
181 OSHA - Sec. 3. Definitions 2012.02.26 1460
180 OSHA - Health and Safety Standards 2012.02.26 1471
179 OSHA History 2012.02.26 1281
178 OSHA 는 어떤곳인가? 2012.02.26 1120
177 Wage Order - summary : Wage Order 몇번을 봐야 하는지? 2012.02.25 12154
176 What is Wage Order? California Wage Orders for 2001 - 2007 and Beyond 2012.02.22 580
175 Wage Order No. 17 - CA 2012.02.22 483
174 Wage Order No. 16 - CA 2012.02.22 470
173 Wage Order No. 15 - CA 2012.02.22 432
172 Wage Order No. 14 - CA 2012.02.22 440
171 Wage Order No. 13 - CA 2012.02.22 408
170 Wage Order No. 12 - CA 2012.02.22 368
169 Wage Order No. 11 - CA 2012.02.22 372
168 Wage Order No. 10 - CA 2012.02.22 318
167 Wage Order No. 9 - CA 2012.02.22 316
166 Wage Order No. 8 - CA 2012.02.22 318
165 Wage Order No. 7 - CA 2012.02.22 316
164 Wage Order No. 6 - CA 2012.02.22 6345
163 Wage Order No. 5- CA 2012.02.22 324
162 Wage Order No. 4 - CA 2012.02.22 367
161 Wage Order No. 3 - CA 2012.02.22 317
160 Wage Order No. 2 - CA 2012.02.22 305
159 Wage Order No. 1 - CA 2012.02.22 302
158 FSA의 두가지 Types: Medical Expenses & Dependent Care Expenses 2012.02.19 1773
157 FSA - Employer로서 주의할 사항은? 2012.02.19 1527
156 FSA - are there individuals who are not eligible to participage in a Section 125 Plan? 2012.02.19 1450
155 State Tax Bracket - California 2012.02.19 1418
154 IRS Tax Bracket 2012.02.19 1394
153 FSA - What is the tax advantage of a Section 125 plan? 구체적으로 세금 혜텍이란 어떤것인가? 2012.02.19 1586
152 FSA - Changing Your Deduction 언제 바꿀수 있을까요? 2012.02.19 1432
151 FSA - Plan시 주의사항 2012.02.19 1401
150 FSA - 실제로 세금혜택을 어느정도 보는 것일까? 2012.02.19 1425
149 What is FSA? 2012.02.19 1870
148 FSA( Flexible Spending Account ) Grace Period 2012.02.18 1616
147 OSHA 300 Log Posting 2012.02.18 533
146 Travel Time Policy - Good point about the PAY RATE during transiting time 2012.01.22 676
145 Travel Time Policy - good example 3 - League of Minessota Cities 2012.01.22 584
144 Travel Time Policy - good example 2 - may be good for your company too. 2012.01.22 777
143 Travel Time Policy - good example 1 - may be good for your company too. 2012.01.22 578
142 Travel Time Policy - 노동청의 규정은 어떻게 되어 있을까요? 2012.01.22 603
141 Travel Time Policy - 출장비를 어떻게 계산해서 지급해야 될까요? 2012.01.22 658
140 Sexual Harassment Charges 2012.01.15 1993
139 CA State - New Hire Requirement - Effective as of 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 1052
138 NY State - New Release - effective 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 371
137 NY State - New Release - effective 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 655
136 CA State - New Hire Requirement - Effective as of 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 674
135 ADA - Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 2012.01.15 554
134 FMLA - Employer Responsibilities 2012.01.15 530
133 FMLA - Employer Responsibilities 2012.01.15 1145
132 FMLA - Employee Responsibilities 2012.01.15 385