today:
144
yesterday:
242
Total:
1,004,302

Articles about Careers

Egg Giant National Food to Pay $650,000 To Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

Employer Failed to Stop Supervisor's Sexual Demands, Retaliated Against Workers Who Spoke Out, Federal Agency Charged

SEATTLE - National Food Corporation, a major supplier of eggs to the Pacific Northwestern and Midwestern United States and East Asia with headquarters in Everett, Wash., will pay $650,000 to five workers and provide other relief to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.

The EEOC's suit charged that a supervisor at National Food's egg farm in Lind, Wash., repeatedly demanded sexual favors from a female laborer, who worked alone in a henhouse, in order to keep her job. Taking advantage of her isolated workplace, the supervisor would physically grab the barn worker and demand sex from her on a weekly basis, from 2003 to 2010. The EEOC also alleged that when her co-workers raised complaints about sexual harassment to company management, they were fired or forced out of their jobs.

"For almost seven years, I tried to just survive these demands from my boss, because I needed to support my mother and my daughter," said the worker. "I hope my case will help other workers to speak out against sexual harassment. It's important to know that that you have a right to say no to sexual demands even from a supervisor, and that the law protects you when you protest harassment."

Sexual harassment violates Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC filed the lawsuit (EEOC v. National Food Corp., CV-12-00550-TOR.) in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, after an investigation conducted by EEOC investigator Richard Hernandez, and first attempting to reach voluntary settlement out of court. The workers were also represented by private counsel from Columbia Legal Services and MacDonald Hogue & Bayless.

"This lawsuit is another in an unfortunate pattern of employers taking advantage of female agricultural workers who often work in isolation and are unaware of their rights," said David Lopez, general counsel of the EEOC. "It is one of the EEOC's national priorities to combat discrimination against vulnerable workers, and we hope that this settlement sends a message to other employers that they need to be vigilant to prevent sexual harassment and other abuse."

Under the consent decree resolving this lawsuit, National Food has also agreed to issue EEO policies in English and Spanish to employees throughout Eastern Washington and South Dakota; institute changes to ensure that its complaint procedures are accessible; and train its management and to hold supervisors accountable for any discrimination, harassment or retaliation under their watch. In addition, National Foods will report harassment complaints to the EEOC for four years, and will not rehire the alleged harasser in any capacity.

"All workers have the right to a workplace free of harassment," said EEOC San Francisco Regional Attorney William R. Tamayo, whose office has jurisdiction over Washington State. "We are glad that National Foods worked with the Commission to reach this resolution without going through lengthy and costly litigation. The settlement will provide significant relief for individuals EEOC believes were victims of egregious harassment and retaliation. The changes in company practices and the discharge of the harasser will hopefully create a safe place for employees."

"Abuse of power should not occur in the workplace, whether in a white-collar office or on an isolated farm," said Michael Baldonado, director of the EEOC's San Francisco District Office. "The steps that National Food has agreed to should send a clear message that sexual harassment and retaliation will not be tolerated."

This case fits within two of the six national priorities identified by the Commission's Strategic Enforcement Plan (SEP): protecting vulnerable workers who may be less familiar with their rights under equal employment laws, and addressing workplace harassment through systemic enforcement and targeted outreach.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Additional information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.

 

http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/5-16-13.cfm

No. Subject Date Views
281 Worker's Comp Insurance 직장에서 다쳤을 경우 어떤 보상을 받을수 있을까요? 2011.11.19 560
280 How to apply UI in CA 갑자기 직장을 잃게 되었을 경우, 어떻게 도움을 받을수 있을까? 2011.11.20 611
279 How to apply UI in CA 갑자기 직장을 잃게 되었을 경우, 어떻게 도움을 받을수 있을까? 2011.11.20 1430
278 Family/Medical Leave 임신/출산 혹은 아픈 가족을 돌봐야 하는데 직장을 안전하게 보장하며 쉴수 있는 방법이 있을까? 2011.11.21 567
277 SDI - 몸이 아파서 직장을 못나가게 되었을때, 무슨 혜택이 있을까? 2011.11.21 440
276 SDI - 몸이 아파서 직장을 못나가게 되었을때, 무슨 혜택이 있을까? 2011.11.21 1783
275 What's the Minimum Wage in CA? 나는 Min Wage를 받고 있는가? 2011.11.27 343
274 Overtime 수당은 누가 언제 받을 수 있을까요? 2011.11.27 1608
273 Overtime 수당은 누가 언제 받을 수 있을까요? 2011.11.27 651
272 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 644
271 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 931
270 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 18128
269 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 404
268 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 889
267 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 674
266 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 412
265 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 1037
264 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 749
263 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 409
262 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 1210
261 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 771
260 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 359
259 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 1787
258 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 752
257 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 43855
256 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 660
255 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 646
254 Rate Your Vacation - 우리회사의 Vacation은 좋은 편인가? Benchmarking해보셔요! 2011.11.30 520
253 Rate Your Vacation - 우리회사의 Vacation은 좋은 편인가? Benchmarking해보셔요! 2011.11.30 732
252 Rate Your Vacation - 우리회사의 Vacation은 좋은 편인가? Benchmarking해보셔요! 2011.11.30 919
251 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 426
250 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 696
249 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 733
248 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 1134
247 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 510
246 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 702
245 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 6072
244 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 998
243 Employee Benefits in US provided by DOL Bureau of Labor Statistics 2011.11.30 467
242 Employee Benefits in US provided by DOL Bureau of Labor Statistics 2011.11.30 625
241 Employee Benefits in US provided by DOL Bureau of Labor Statistics 2011.11.30 858
240 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 419
239 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 710
238 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 669
237 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 1053
236 미국내 회사들의 평균 Sick Days ( 병가)는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 536
235 미국내 회사들의 평균 Vacation은 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 472
234 Vacation을 아예 안준다면 법적으로 문제가 될까요? 2011.11.30 505
233 Common Interviewing Mistakes -인터뷰할 때 가장 범하기 쉬운 실수 5가지!! 2011.12.06 764
232 Interview Question-Candidates may be asked - 인터뷰시 물어봐도 되는 질문들 2011.12.06 861