today:
18
yesterday:
301
Total:
1,001,924

Articles about Careers

Egg Giant National Food to Pay $650,000 To Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

Employer Failed to Stop Supervisor's Sexual Demands, Retaliated Against Workers Who Spoke Out, Federal Agency Charged

SEATTLE - National Food Corporation, a major supplier of eggs to the Pacific Northwestern and Midwestern United States and East Asia with headquarters in Everett, Wash., will pay $650,000 to five workers and provide other relief to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.

The EEOC's suit charged that a supervisor at National Food's egg farm in Lind, Wash., repeatedly demanded sexual favors from a female laborer, who worked alone in a henhouse, in order to keep her job. Taking advantage of her isolated workplace, the supervisor would physically grab the barn worker and demand sex from her on a weekly basis, from 2003 to 2010. The EEOC also alleged that when her co-workers raised complaints about sexual harassment to company management, they were fired or forced out of their jobs.

"For almost seven years, I tried to just survive these demands from my boss, because I needed to support my mother and my daughter," said the worker. "I hope my case will help other workers to speak out against sexual harassment. It's important to know that that you have a right to say no to sexual demands even from a supervisor, and that the law protects you when you protest harassment."

Sexual harassment violates Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC filed the lawsuit (EEOC v. National Food Corp., CV-12-00550-TOR.) in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, after an investigation conducted by EEOC investigator Richard Hernandez, and first attempting to reach voluntary settlement out of court. The workers were also represented by private counsel from Columbia Legal Services and MacDonald Hogue & Bayless.

"This lawsuit is another in an unfortunate pattern of employers taking advantage of female agricultural workers who often work in isolation and are unaware of their rights," said David Lopez, general counsel of the EEOC. "It is one of the EEOC's national priorities to combat discrimination against vulnerable workers, and we hope that this settlement sends a message to other employers that they need to be vigilant to prevent sexual harassment and other abuse."

Under the consent decree resolving this lawsuit, National Food has also agreed to issue EEO policies in English and Spanish to employees throughout Eastern Washington and South Dakota; institute changes to ensure that its complaint procedures are accessible; and train its management and to hold supervisors accountable for any discrimination, harassment or retaliation under their watch. In addition, National Foods will report harassment complaints to the EEOC for four years, and will not rehire the alleged harasser in any capacity.

"All workers have the right to a workplace free of harassment," said EEOC San Francisco Regional Attorney William R. Tamayo, whose office has jurisdiction over Washington State. "We are glad that National Foods worked with the Commission to reach this resolution without going through lengthy and costly litigation. The settlement will provide significant relief for individuals EEOC believes were victims of egregious harassment and retaliation. The changes in company practices and the discharge of the harasser will hopefully create a safe place for employees."

"Abuse of power should not occur in the workplace, whether in a white-collar office or on an isolated farm," said Michael Baldonado, director of the EEOC's San Francisco District Office. "The steps that National Food has agreed to should send a clear message that sexual harassment and retaliation will not be tolerated."

This case fits within two of the six national priorities identified by the Commission's Strategic Enforcement Plan (SEP): protecting vulnerable workers who may be less familiar with their rights under equal employment laws, and addressing workplace harassment through systemic enforcement and targeted outreach.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Additional information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.

 

http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/5-16-13.cfm

No. Subject Date Views
181 FLSA Status - 어떻게 Exempt인지 Non Exempt인지 구분하나요? 단계별 test를 해보세요. 2013.11.25 1079
180 Money: It’s Not All Employees Want 2012.08.09 1071
179 CA State - New Hire Requirement - Effective as of 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 1052
178 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 1052
177 $7 Billion Lost in payroll tax revenue - President Obama's 2010 Budget estimated for independent contractor misclassification 2012.03.10 1046
176 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 1037
175 Age Discrimination 2012.08.04 1036
174 Multi-Million Dollar Overtime Laws Class Action Has July Court Date 2012.07.07 1029
173 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 997
172 Misclassification-15 Billion in 2001 - IRS now coming to collect - 안전하신가요? 2012.01.05 974
171 Employee vs Independent Contractor - EDD Guideline 2012.03.10 964
170 FedEx’s Legal Problems Over Misclassified Workers Continues - $27 million settlement 2012.03.10 958
169 Sexual Harassment- Complaint Procedures 2011.12.31 949
168 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 931
167 Employment Law Basics 2016.01.14 927
166 Rate Your Vacation - 우리회사의 Vacation은 좋은 편인가? Benchmarking해보셔요! 2011.11.30 919
165 Newly Hired or Promoted Managers - sexual harassment 주시고 계신가요? 2013.11.25 912
164 Sexual Harassment- Key Elements of Investigation Procedures 2011.12.31 896
163 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 889
162 Examples of a hostile work environment 2011.12.28 887
161 Interview Question-Candidates may be asked - 인터뷰시 물어봐도 되는 질문들 2011.12.06 861
160 Employee Benefits in US provided by DOL Bureau of Labor Statistics 2011.11.30 858
159 Employee vs Independent Contractor - IRS Guideline 2012.03.10 845
158 4 Overtime Traps to Avoid 2012.07.07 832
157 Wrongful Termination Lawsuits on the Rise 2012.07.07 824
156 Interview Question-Candidates should not be asked - 인터뷰시 하면 안되는 질문들!! 2011.12.06 779
155 Travel Time Policy - good example 2 - may be good for your company too. 2012.01.22 777
154 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 771
153 Common Interviewing Mistakes -인터뷰할 때 가장 범하기 쉬운 실수 5가지!! 2011.12.06 764
152 California Overtime Violations FAQ - I work part time and am paid a monthly salary. Does that exclude me from overtime? 2012.07.07 762
151 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 752
150 What is Protected Class? 2011.12.27 751
149 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 749
148 EEOC’s Definition of Sexual Harassment 2011.12.27 734
147 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 733
146 Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI) 2012.01.08 732
145 Rate Your Vacation - 우리회사의 Vacation은 좋은 편인가? Benchmarking해보셔요! 2011.11.30 732
144 California Overtime Violations FAQ - what does exemption or being exempt mean? 2012.07.07 732
143 Sexual Harassment - What is the big deal? 2011.12.26 727
142 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 710
141 California Overtime Violations FAQ - Can I file an overtime complaint against my current employer? 2012.07.07 708
140 California Overtime Violations FAQ - signed up a statement as exempt and supervisor told no overtime. Is that right? 2012.07.07 706
139 California Overtime Violations FAQ - What can I do if my employer doens't pay me my overtime wages? 2012.07.07 705
138 Pay Notices Required to be Provided New Employees as of 1/1/2012 2011.12.18 704
137 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 702
136 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 696
135 California Overtime Violations FAQ - Does travel time count as overtime? 2012.07.07 678
134 Types of Sexual Harassment - Quid Pro Quo/ Hostile Work environment 2011.12.27 677
133 Travel Time Policy - Good point about the PAY RATE during transiting time 2012.01.22 676
132 CA State - New Hire Requirement - Effective as of 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 674