today:
121
yesterday:
242
Total:
1,004,279

Articles about Careers

Panda Express Agrees to Early Settlement with EEOC to Resolve Sexual Harassment Suit

Teens at Quick Service Restaurant Chain in Hawaii Were Physically Groped and Demeaned by Supervisor, Federal Agency Says

HONOLULU - Chinese quick service restaurant giant Panda Express will pay $150,000 to settle an EEOC lawsuit on behalf of at least three female teenagers who were allegedly sexually harassed between 2007 and 2009 while working in a restaurant in Kauai, Hawaii, the federal agency announced today.

According to the EEOC, one male kitchen supervisor at the Panda Express in Kapaa, Kauai, sexually harassed some females on staff over four years ago.  The supervisor subjected the workers, some of whom were between the ages of 17 and 19, to sexual comments, language and advances, the EEOC said.  Upon reporting the harassment to the general manager, the EEOC said, Panda Express management failed to take enough action to stop or correct the situation.

Sexual harassment violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  The EEOC filed its lawsuit in September 2012 in U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii (EEOC v. Panda Express, Inc. and Panda Restaurant Groups, Inc., Case No. 1:12-cv-00530-SOM-RLP) after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.  As part of the settlement announced today, the parties entered into a two-year consent decree requiring Panda Express to designate an in-house equal employment opportunity (EEO) coordinator; revise and distribute its anti-harassment policy and procedures; and provide annual sexual harassment training to all employees in Kapaa and to all general managers in the state of Hawaii.  EEOC will monitor compliance with the agreement, and Panda Express agreed to reinforce its protocols relating to complaints of sexual harassment in its Hawaii region.

"We commend Panda Express for working with the EEOC to correct serious lapses in dealing with sexual harassment in the workplace," said Anna Y. Park, regional attorney for the EEOC's Los Angeles District Office, which includes Hawaii in its jurisdiction.  "We trust that Panda Express's company values are consistent with the goals of the EEOC's mission, and we commend them for agreeing to broader injunctive remedies to ensure that the workers in Hawaii are protected." 

Timothy Riera, local director for the EEOC's Honolulu Local Office, added, "We encourage employers to conduct meaningful training of its employees on what the policies and procedures are with respect to sexual harassment.  Those who exercise their right to report sexual harassment and discrimination at work are also protected from illegal retaliation.  The EEOC is certainly here to help, especially when employers fail to meet their legal obligation to protect our youngest workers."

According to the company website, www.pandaexpress.com, Rosemead, Calif.-based Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. manages and owns over 1,600 restaurants in 42 states.

The EEOC recently updated its Youth@Work website (at http://www.eeoc.gov/youth/), which presents information for teens and other young workers about employment discrimination.  The website also contains curriculum guides for students and teachers and videos to help young workers learn about their rights and responsibilities in the work force.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. 

 

Further information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.

No. Subject Date Views
31 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 1134
30 Rate Your Vacation - 우리회사의 Vacation은 좋은 편인가? Benchmarking해보셔요! 2011.11.30 520
29 Rate Your Vacation - 우리회사의 Vacation은 좋은 편인가? Benchmarking해보셔요! 2011.11.30 732
28 Rate Your Vacation - 우리회사의 Vacation은 좋은 편인가? Benchmarking해보셔요! 2011.11.30 919
27 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 43855
26 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 660
25 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 646
24 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 359
23 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 1787
22 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 752
21 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 409
20 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 1210
19 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 771
18 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 412
17 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 1037
16 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 749
15 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 404
14 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 889
13 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 674
12 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 644
11 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 931
10 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 18128
9 Overtime 수당은 누가 언제 받을 수 있을까요? 2011.11.27 1608
8 Overtime 수당은 누가 언제 받을 수 있을까요? 2011.11.27 651
7 What's the Minimum Wage in CA? 나는 Min Wage를 받고 있는가? 2011.11.27 343
6 SDI - 몸이 아파서 직장을 못나가게 되었을때, 무슨 혜택이 있을까? 2011.11.21 440
5 SDI - 몸이 아파서 직장을 못나가게 되었을때, 무슨 혜택이 있을까? 2011.11.21 1783
4 Family/Medical Leave 임신/출산 혹은 아픈 가족을 돌봐야 하는데 직장을 안전하게 보장하며 쉴수 있는 방법이 있을까? 2011.11.21 567
3 How to apply UI in CA 갑자기 직장을 잃게 되었을 경우, 어떻게 도움을 받을수 있을까? 2011.11.20 611
2 How to apply UI in CA 갑자기 직장을 잃게 되었을 경우, 어떻게 도움을 받을수 있을까? 2011.11.20 1430
1 Worker's Comp Insurance 직장에서 다쳤을 경우 어떤 보상을 받을수 있을까요? 2011.11.19 560