today:
126
yesterday:
242
Total:
1,004,284

Articles about Careers

BASF Corporation to Pay $500,000 to Settle EEOC Retaliation Lawsuit Against Cognis

Employees Were Forced to Sacrifice Their Civil Rights or Their Jobs, Agency Charged

URBANA, Ill. - BASF Corporation will pay $500,000 to settle a retaliation lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against Cognis Corporation, the EEOC announced today.  BASF acquired Cognis in 2010.

In its lawsuit, the EEOC charged - and the judge later held - that Cognis retaliated against a longtime employee at its Kankakee, Ill., facility in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  Cognis had required that employee, as a condition of his continued employment, to sign a "last-chance agreement."  That agreement prohibited the employee from filing charges of discrimination with the EEOC, even for events that had yet to occur.  When the employee informed Cognis that he did not want to be bound by the agreement out of concern about its effect on his civil rights, Cognis fired him.

The EEOC brought suit (EEOC v. Cognis Corp., 10-CV-2182, C.D. Ill.) in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois after first attempting to resolve the case through its conciliation process.

Chief U.S. District Judge Michael P. McCuskey held in May 2012 that the employee's termination constituted unlawful retaliation in violation of Title VII.  With that issue decided, the only question left for trial was the extent of the employee's damages.

The EEOC's lawsuit also alleged that Cognis retaliated against five additional employees by forcing those employees to make a similarly illegal choice.  Those employees chose to sign a last chance agreement that stripped them of their right to file charges and seek relief for future discriminatory conduct - rather than be terminated.  By settling the lawsuit, BASF has opted not to continue defending against those allegations.

Judge McCuskey entered a consent decree resolving the lawsuit on January 25, 2013.  The decree provides monetary relief to the victims and requires BASF to report all employee retaliation complaints under Title VII at the Kankakee facility to the EEOC for the next two years.  BASF must also train a specified group of its employees on prohibited retaliation under the federal employment nondiscrimination laws and adopt a new policy informing employees of their right to oppose unlawful discrimination without fear of retaliation.  Furthermore, BASF agreed that it would not require the recipients of monetary relief to keep confidential the allegations and facts underlying the charge, to waive their rights to file a charge with any government agency, or to refrain from reapplying for work with the company.

"The EEOC has an inherent, institutional interest in maintaining open lines of communication with people who believe they may be victims of discrimination," said John Hendrickson, the EEOC's regional attorney in Chicago.  "That is why employers who attempt to break that line of communication by dissuading employees from filing EEOC charges are breaking the law.  Courts get that, and with this case, we hope more employers will as well."

EEOC's Chicago District Director John Rowe, added, "Cognis presented the victims in this case with a terrible, illegal choice: lose your job or lose your civil rights.  Under the law, no worker has to make that kind of choice.  Employers would be better served by working to ensure that their employees are free from discrimination, rather than threatening their workers with termination in an effort to make sure that employees don't complain."

The EEOC's litigation team was led by Supervisory Trial Attorney Gregory M. Gochanour and Trial Attorneys Deborah Hamilton and Brad Fiorito of the Chicago District Office.

Cognis was acquired in December 2010 by BASF, a multinational chemical company.  According to the most recent information available on the BASF website, BASF Corporation has approximately 16,000 employees in North America and in 2011 had sales of $20 billion.

EEOC is responsible for enforcing federal laws prohibiting discrimination.  The EEOC's Chicago District Office is responsible for processing discrimination charges, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litigation in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and North and South Dakota, with Area Offices in Milwaukee and Minneapolis. 

 

Further information about the EEOC is available at www.eeoc.gov.

No. Subject Date Views
281 Worker's Comp Insurance 직장에서 다쳤을 경우 어떤 보상을 받을수 있을까요? 2011.11.19 560
280 How to apply UI in CA 갑자기 직장을 잃게 되었을 경우, 어떻게 도움을 받을수 있을까? 2011.11.20 611
279 How to apply UI in CA 갑자기 직장을 잃게 되었을 경우, 어떻게 도움을 받을수 있을까? 2011.11.20 1430
278 Family/Medical Leave 임신/출산 혹은 아픈 가족을 돌봐야 하는데 직장을 안전하게 보장하며 쉴수 있는 방법이 있을까? 2011.11.21 567
277 SDI - 몸이 아파서 직장을 못나가게 되었을때, 무슨 혜택이 있을까? 2011.11.21 440
276 SDI - 몸이 아파서 직장을 못나가게 되었을때, 무슨 혜택이 있을까? 2011.11.21 1783
275 What's the Minimum Wage in CA? 나는 Min Wage를 받고 있는가? 2011.11.27 343
274 Overtime 수당은 누가 언제 받을 수 있을까요? 2011.11.27 1608
273 Overtime 수당은 누가 언제 받을 수 있을까요? 2011.11.27 651
272 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 644
271 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 931
270 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 18128
269 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 404
268 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 889
267 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 674
266 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 412
265 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 1037
264 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 749
263 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 409
262 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 1210
261 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 771
260 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 359
259 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 1787
258 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 752
257 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 43855
256 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 660
255 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 646
254 Rate Your Vacation - 우리회사의 Vacation은 좋은 편인가? Benchmarking해보셔요! 2011.11.30 520
253 Rate Your Vacation - 우리회사의 Vacation은 좋은 편인가? Benchmarking해보셔요! 2011.11.30 732
252 Rate Your Vacation - 우리회사의 Vacation은 좋은 편인가? Benchmarking해보셔요! 2011.11.30 919
251 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 426
250 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 696
249 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 733
248 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 1134
247 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 510
246 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 702
245 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 6072
244 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 998
243 Employee Benefits in US provided by DOL Bureau of Labor Statistics 2011.11.30 467
242 Employee Benefits in US provided by DOL Bureau of Labor Statistics 2011.11.30 625
241 Employee Benefits in US provided by DOL Bureau of Labor Statistics 2011.11.30 858
240 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 419
239 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 710
238 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 669
237 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 1053
236 미국내 회사들의 평균 Sick Days ( 병가)는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 536
235 미국내 회사들의 평균 Vacation은 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 472
234 Vacation을 아예 안준다면 법적으로 문제가 될까요? 2011.11.30 505
233 Common Interviewing Mistakes -인터뷰할 때 가장 범하기 쉬운 실수 5가지!! 2011.12.06 764
232 Interview Question-Candidates may be asked - 인터뷰시 물어봐도 되는 질문들 2011.12.06 861