today:
112
yesterday:
198
Total:
1,004,892

Articles about Careers

BASF Corporation to Pay $500,000 to Settle EEOC Retaliation Lawsuit Against Cognis

Employees Were Forced to Sacrifice Their Civil Rights or Their Jobs, Agency Charged

URBANA, Ill. - BASF Corporation will pay $500,000 to settle a retaliation lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against Cognis Corporation, the EEOC announced today.  BASF acquired Cognis in 2010.

In its lawsuit, the EEOC charged - and the judge later held - that Cognis retaliated against a longtime employee at its Kankakee, Ill., facility in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  Cognis had required that employee, as a condition of his continued employment, to sign a "last-chance agreement."  That agreement prohibited the employee from filing charges of discrimination with the EEOC, even for events that had yet to occur.  When the employee informed Cognis that he did not want to be bound by the agreement out of concern about its effect on his civil rights, Cognis fired him.

The EEOC brought suit (EEOC v. Cognis Corp., 10-CV-2182, C.D. Ill.) in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois after first attempting to resolve the case through its conciliation process.

Chief U.S. District Judge Michael P. McCuskey held in May 2012 that the employee's termination constituted unlawful retaliation in violation of Title VII.  With that issue decided, the only question left for trial was the extent of the employee's damages.

The EEOC's lawsuit also alleged that Cognis retaliated against five additional employees by forcing those employees to make a similarly illegal choice.  Those employees chose to sign a last chance agreement that stripped them of their right to file charges and seek relief for future discriminatory conduct - rather than be terminated.  By settling the lawsuit, BASF has opted not to continue defending against those allegations.

Judge McCuskey entered a consent decree resolving the lawsuit on January 25, 2013.  The decree provides monetary relief to the victims and requires BASF to report all employee retaliation complaints under Title VII at the Kankakee facility to the EEOC for the next two years.  BASF must also train a specified group of its employees on prohibited retaliation under the federal employment nondiscrimination laws and adopt a new policy informing employees of their right to oppose unlawful discrimination without fear of retaliation.  Furthermore, BASF agreed that it would not require the recipients of monetary relief to keep confidential the allegations and facts underlying the charge, to waive their rights to file a charge with any government agency, or to refrain from reapplying for work with the company.

"The EEOC has an inherent, institutional interest in maintaining open lines of communication with people who believe they may be victims of discrimination," said John Hendrickson, the EEOC's regional attorney in Chicago.  "That is why employers who attempt to break that line of communication by dissuading employees from filing EEOC charges are breaking the law.  Courts get that, and with this case, we hope more employers will as well."

EEOC's Chicago District Director John Rowe, added, "Cognis presented the victims in this case with a terrible, illegal choice: lose your job or lose your civil rights.  Under the law, no worker has to make that kind of choice.  Employers would be better served by working to ensure that their employees are free from discrimination, rather than threatening their workers with termination in an effort to make sure that employees don't complain."

The EEOC's litigation team was led by Supervisory Trial Attorney Gregory M. Gochanour and Trial Attorneys Deborah Hamilton and Brad Fiorito of the Chicago District Office.

Cognis was acquired in December 2010 by BASF, a multinational chemical company.  According to the most recent information available on the BASF website, BASF Corporation has approximately 16,000 employees in North America and in 2011 had sales of $20 billion.

EEOC is responsible for enforcing federal laws prohibiting discrimination.  The EEOC's Chicago District Office is responsible for processing discrimination charges, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litigation in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and North and South Dakota, with Area Offices in Milwaukee and Minneapolis. 

 

Further information about the EEOC is available at www.eeoc.gov.

No. Subject Date Views
181 OSHA - Sec. 3. Definitions 2012.02.26 1460
180 OSHA - Health and Safety Standards 2012.02.26 1471
179 OSHA History 2012.02.26 1281
178 OSHA 는 어떤곳인가? 2012.02.26 1120
177 Wage Order - summary : Wage Order 몇번을 봐야 하는지? 2012.02.25 12154
176 What is Wage Order? California Wage Orders for 2001 - 2007 and Beyond 2012.02.22 580
175 Wage Order No. 17 - CA 2012.02.22 483
174 Wage Order No. 16 - CA 2012.02.22 470
173 Wage Order No. 15 - CA 2012.02.22 432
172 Wage Order No. 14 - CA 2012.02.22 440
171 Wage Order No. 13 - CA 2012.02.22 408
170 Wage Order No. 12 - CA 2012.02.22 368
169 Wage Order No. 11 - CA 2012.02.22 372
168 Wage Order No. 10 - CA 2012.02.22 318
167 Wage Order No. 9 - CA 2012.02.22 316
166 Wage Order No. 8 - CA 2012.02.22 318
165 Wage Order No. 7 - CA 2012.02.22 316
164 Wage Order No. 6 - CA 2012.02.22 6345
163 Wage Order No. 5- CA 2012.02.22 324
162 Wage Order No. 4 - CA 2012.02.22 367
161 Wage Order No. 3 - CA 2012.02.22 317
160 Wage Order No. 2 - CA 2012.02.22 305
159 Wage Order No. 1 - CA 2012.02.22 302
158 FSA의 두가지 Types: Medical Expenses & Dependent Care Expenses 2012.02.19 1773
157 FSA - Employer로서 주의할 사항은? 2012.02.19 1527
156 FSA - are there individuals who are not eligible to participage in a Section 125 Plan? 2012.02.19 1450
155 State Tax Bracket - California 2012.02.19 1418
154 IRS Tax Bracket 2012.02.19 1394
153 FSA - What is the tax advantage of a Section 125 plan? 구체적으로 세금 혜텍이란 어떤것인가? 2012.02.19 1586
152 FSA - Changing Your Deduction 언제 바꿀수 있을까요? 2012.02.19 1432
151 FSA - Plan시 주의사항 2012.02.19 1401
150 FSA - 실제로 세금혜택을 어느정도 보는 것일까? 2012.02.19 1425
149 What is FSA? 2012.02.19 1870
148 FSA( Flexible Spending Account ) Grace Period 2012.02.18 1616
147 OSHA 300 Log Posting 2012.02.18 533
146 Travel Time Policy - Good point about the PAY RATE during transiting time 2012.01.22 676
145 Travel Time Policy - good example 3 - League of Minessota Cities 2012.01.22 584
144 Travel Time Policy - good example 2 - may be good for your company too. 2012.01.22 777
143 Travel Time Policy - good example 1 - may be good for your company too. 2012.01.22 578
142 Travel Time Policy - 노동청의 규정은 어떻게 되어 있을까요? 2012.01.22 603
141 Travel Time Policy - 출장비를 어떻게 계산해서 지급해야 될까요? 2012.01.22 658
140 Sexual Harassment Charges 2012.01.15 1993
139 CA State - New Hire Requirement - Effective as of 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 1052
138 NY State - New Release - effective 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 371
137 NY State - New Release - effective 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 655
136 CA State - New Hire Requirement - Effective as of 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 674
135 ADA - Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 2012.01.15 554
134 FMLA - Employer Responsibilities 2012.01.15 530
133 FMLA - Employer Responsibilities 2012.01.15 1145
132 FMLA - Employee Responsibilities 2012.01.15 385