today:
137
yesterday:
148
Total:
999,273

Articles about Careers

Egg Giant National Food to Pay $650,000 To Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

Employer Failed to Stop Supervisor's Sexual Demands, Retaliated Against Workers Who Spoke Out, Federal Agency Charged

SEATTLE - National Food Corporation, a major supplier of eggs to the Pacific Northwestern and Midwestern United States and East Asia with headquarters in Everett, Wash., will pay $650,000 to five workers and provide other relief to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.

The EEOC's suit charged that a supervisor at National Food's egg farm in Lind, Wash., repeatedly demanded sexual favors from a female laborer, who worked alone in a henhouse, in order to keep her job. Taking advantage of her isolated workplace, the supervisor would physically grab the barn worker and demand sex from her on a weekly basis, from 2003 to 2010. The EEOC also alleged that when her co-workers raised complaints about sexual harassment to company management, they were fired or forced out of their jobs.

"For almost seven years, I tried to just survive these demands from my boss, because I needed to support my mother and my daughter," said the worker. "I hope my case will help other workers to speak out against sexual harassment. It's important to know that that you have a right to say no to sexual demands even from a supervisor, and that the law protects you when you protest harassment."

Sexual harassment violates Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC filed the lawsuit (EEOC v. National Food Corp., CV-12-00550-TOR.) in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, after an investigation conducted by EEOC investigator Richard Hernandez, and first attempting to reach voluntary settlement out of court. The workers were also represented by private counsel from Columbia Legal Services and MacDonald Hogue & Bayless.

"This lawsuit is another in an unfortunate pattern of employers taking advantage of female agricultural workers who often work in isolation and are unaware of their rights," said David Lopez, general counsel of the EEOC. "It is one of the EEOC's national priorities to combat discrimination against vulnerable workers, and we hope that this settlement sends a message to other employers that they need to be vigilant to prevent sexual harassment and other abuse."

Under the consent decree resolving this lawsuit, National Food has also agreed to issue EEO policies in English and Spanish to employees throughout Eastern Washington and South Dakota; institute changes to ensure that its complaint procedures are accessible; and train its management and to hold supervisors accountable for any discrimination, harassment or retaliation under their watch. In addition, National Foods will report harassment complaints to the EEOC for four years, and will not rehire the alleged harasser in any capacity.

"All workers have the right to a workplace free of harassment," said EEOC San Francisco Regional Attorney William R. Tamayo, whose office has jurisdiction over Washington State. "We are glad that National Foods worked with the Commission to reach this resolution without going through lengthy and costly litigation. The settlement will provide significant relief for individuals EEOC believes were victims of egregious harassment and retaliation. The changes in company practices and the discharge of the harasser will hopefully create a safe place for employees."

"Abuse of power should not occur in the workplace, whether in a white-collar office or on an isolated farm," said Michael Baldonado, director of the EEOC's San Francisco District Office. "The steps that National Food has agreed to should send a clear message that sexual harassment and retaliation will not be tolerated."

This case fits within two of the six national priorities identified by the Commission's Strategic Enforcement Plan (SEP): protecting vulnerable workers who may be less familiar with their rights under equal employment laws, and addressing workplace harassment through systemic enforcement and targeted outreach.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Additional information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.

 

http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/5-16-13.cfm

No. Subject Date Views
281 Wage Order No. 1 - CA 2012.02.22 302
280 Wage Order No. 2 - CA 2012.02.22 305
279 Wage Order No. 7 - CA 2012.02.22 316
278 Wage Order No. 9 - CA 2012.02.22 316
277 Wage Order No. 3 - CA 2012.02.22 317
276 Wage Order No. 8 - CA 2012.02.22 318
275 Wage Order No. 10 - CA 2012.02.22 318
274 Wage Order No. 5- CA 2012.02.22 324
273 FMLA - Basic Leave Entitlement 2012.01.15 340
272 What's the Minimum Wage in CA? 나는 Min Wage를 받고 있는가? 2011.11.27 343
271 What is FMLA? 2012.01.15 344
270 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 359
269 FMLA - Military Family Leave Entitlements 2012.01.15 362
268 Pay Notices Required to be Provided New Employees as of 1/1/2012 2011.12.18 364
267 Federal Jury Awards $105K in EEOC Sexual Harassment Case Against Racine IHOP (Restaurant) 2012.01.03 365
266 Wage Order No. 4 - CA 2012.02.22 367
265 What is DUA (Disaster Unemployment Assistance)? 2011.12.13 368
264 Examples of Conduct that May be Unlawful 2011.12.28 368
263 Wage Order No. 12 - CA 2012.02.22 368
262 FMLA - Benefits and Protections 2012.01.15 370
261 NY State - New Release - effective 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 371
260 Wage Order No. 11 - CA 2012.02.22 372
259 What do I need to file a claim? 2011.12.13 373
258 Misclassification-15 Billion in 2001 - IRS now coming to collect - 안전하신가요? 2012.01.05 375
257 What is the Purpose of I-9 Form? 2011.12.10 379
256 What is Protected Class? 2011.12.27 384
255 You DO NOT complete a Form I-9 for persons who are: 2011.12.10 385
254 FMLA - Employee Responsibilities 2012.01.15 385
253 Who is Eligible for DUA? 2011.12.13 386
252 What Is the Filing Fee? 2011.12.10 391
251 Sexual Harassment- Complaint Procedures 2011.12.31 392
250 I-9 Form: The Rules of Use 2011.12.10 398
249 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 404
248 Examples of a hostile work environment 2011.12.28 406
247 Best Practices for Limiting Employer Liability (가장중요한 대책들입니다.) 2012.01.02 408
246 Wage Order No. 13 - CA 2012.02.22 408
245 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 409
244 FMLA - Eligibility Requirements 2012.01.15 411
243 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 412
242 What is I-9? 2011.12.10 417
241 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 419
240 SB 459: Penalties for employers who misclassify employees as independent contractors. 2011.12.18 421
239 HR - 아무리해도 강조해도 지나치지 않는것!! 2012.01.08 422
238 What is Flexible Spending Account (FSA)? 2011.12.22 424
237 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 426
236 What is Fiduciary Liability Insurance? 2012.01.08 427
235 Wage Order No. 15 - CA 2012.02.22 432
234 SDI - 몸이 아파서 직장을 못나가게 되었을때, 무슨 혜택이 있을까? 2011.11.21 440
233 Wage Order No. 14 - CA 2012.02.22 440
232 401K - Fidelity Bonds 2012.01.08 452