today:
170
yesterday:
148
Total:
999,306

Articles about Careers

BASF Corporation to Pay $500,000 to Settle EEOC Retaliation Lawsuit Against Cognis

Employees Were Forced to Sacrifice Their Civil Rights or Their Jobs, Agency Charged

URBANA, Ill. - BASF Corporation will pay $500,000 to settle a retaliation lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against Cognis Corporation, the EEOC announced today.  BASF acquired Cognis in 2010.

In its lawsuit, the EEOC charged - and the judge later held - that Cognis retaliated against a longtime employee at its Kankakee, Ill., facility in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  Cognis had required that employee, as a condition of his continued employment, to sign a "last-chance agreement."  That agreement prohibited the employee from filing charges of discrimination with the EEOC, even for events that had yet to occur.  When the employee informed Cognis that he did not want to be bound by the agreement out of concern about its effect on his civil rights, Cognis fired him.

The EEOC brought suit (EEOC v. Cognis Corp., 10-CV-2182, C.D. Ill.) in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois after first attempting to resolve the case through its conciliation process.

Chief U.S. District Judge Michael P. McCuskey held in May 2012 that the employee's termination constituted unlawful retaliation in violation of Title VII.  With that issue decided, the only question left for trial was the extent of the employee's damages.

The EEOC's lawsuit also alleged that Cognis retaliated against five additional employees by forcing those employees to make a similarly illegal choice.  Those employees chose to sign a last chance agreement that stripped them of their right to file charges and seek relief for future discriminatory conduct - rather than be terminated.  By settling the lawsuit, BASF has opted not to continue defending against those allegations.

Judge McCuskey entered a consent decree resolving the lawsuit on January 25, 2013.  The decree provides monetary relief to the victims and requires BASF to report all employee retaliation complaints under Title VII at the Kankakee facility to the EEOC for the next two years.  BASF must also train a specified group of its employees on prohibited retaliation under the federal employment nondiscrimination laws and adopt a new policy informing employees of their right to oppose unlawful discrimination without fear of retaliation.  Furthermore, BASF agreed that it would not require the recipients of monetary relief to keep confidential the allegations and facts underlying the charge, to waive their rights to file a charge with any government agency, or to refrain from reapplying for work with the company.

"The EEOC has an inherent, institutional interest in maintaining open lines of communication with people who believe they may be victims of discrimination," said John Hendrickson, the EEOC's regional attorney in Chicago.  "That is why employers who attempt to break that line of communication by dissuading employees from filing EEOC charges are breaking the law.  Courts get that, and with this case, we hope more employers will as well."

EEOC's Chicago District Director John Rowe, added, "Cognis presented the victims in this case with a terrible, illegal choice: lose your job or lose your civil rights.  Under the law, no worker has to make that kind of choice.  Employers would be better served by working to ensure that their employees are free from discrimination, rather than threatening their workers with termination in an effort to make sure that employees don't complain."

The EEOC's litigation team was led by Supervisory Trial Attorney Gregory M. Gochanour and Trial Attorneys Deborah Hamilton and Brad Fiorito of the Chicago District Office.

Cognis was acquired in December 2010 by BASF, a multinational chemical company.  According to the most recent information available on the BASF website, BASF Corporation has approximately 16,000 employees in North America and in 2011 had sales of $20 billion.

EEOC is responsible for enforcing federal laws prohibiting discrimination.  The EEOC's Chicago District Office is responsible for processing discrimination charges, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litigation in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and North and South Dakota, with Area Offices in Milwaukee and Minneapolis. 

 

Further information about the EEOC is available at www.eeoc.gov.

No. Subject Date Views
281 Wage Order No. 1 - CA 2012.02.22 302
280 Wage Order No. 2 - CA 2012.02.22 305
279 Wage Order No. 7 - CA 2012.02.22 316
278 Wage Order No. 9 - CA 2012.02.22 316
277 Wage Order No. 3 - CA 2012.02.22 317
276 Wage Order No. 8 - CA 2012.02.22 318
275 Wage Order No. 10 - CA 2012.02.22 318
274 Wage Order No. 5- CA 2012.02.22 324
273 FMLA - Basic Leave Entitlement 2012.01.15 340
272 What's the Minimum Wage in CA? 나는 Min Wage를 받고 있는가? 2011.11.27 343
271 What is FMLA? 2012.01.15 344
270 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 359
269 FMLA - Military Family Leave Entitlements 2012.01.15 362
268 Pay Notices Required to be Provided New Employees as of 1/1/2012 2011.12.18 364
267 Federal Jury Awards $105K in EEOC Sexual Harassment Case Against Racine IHOP (Restaurant) 2012.01.03 365
266 Wage Order No. 4 - CA 2012.02.22 367
265 What is DUA (Disaster Unemployment Assistance)? 2011.12.13 368
264 Examples of Conduct that May be Unlawful 2011.12.28 368
263 Wage Order No. 12 - CA 2012.02.22 368
262 FMLA - Benefits and Protections 2012.01.15 370
261 NY State - New Release - effective 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 371
260 Wage Order No. 11 - CA 2012.02.22 372
259 What do I need to file a claim? 2011.12.13 373
258 Misclassification-15 Billion in 2001 - IRS now coming to collect - 안전하신가요? 2012.01.05 375
257 What is the Purpose of I-9 Form? 2011.12.10 379
256 What is Protected Class? 2011.12.27 384
255 You DO NOT complete a Form I-9 for persons who are: 2011.12.10 385
254 FMLA - Employee Responsibilities 2012.01.15 385
253 Who is Eligible for DUA? 2011.12.13 386
252 What Is the Filing Fee? 2011.12.10 391
251 Sexual Harassment- Complaint Procedures 2011.12.31 392
250 I-9 Form: The Rules of Use 2011.12.10 398
249 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 404
248 Examples of a hostile work environment 2011.12.28 406
247 Best Practices for Limiting Employer Liability (가장중요한 대책들입니다.) 2012.01.02 408
246 Wage Order No. 13 - CA 2012.02.22 408
245 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 409
244 FMLA - Eligibility Requirements 2012.01.15 411
243 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 412
242 What is I-9? 2011.12.10 417
241 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 419
240 SB 459: Penalties for employers who misclassify employees as independent contractors. 2011.12.18 421
239 HR - 아무리해도 강조해도 지나치지 않는것!! 2012.01.08 422
238 What is Flexible Spending Account (FSA)? 2011.12.22 424
237 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 426
236 What is Fiduciary Liability Insurance? 2012.01.08 427
235 Wage Order No. 15 - CA 2012.02.22 432
234 SDI - 몸이 아파서 직장을 못나가게 되었을때, 무슨 혜택이 있을까? 2011.11.21 440
233 Wage Order No. 14 - CA 2012.02.22 440
232 401K - Fidelity Bonds 2012.01.08 452