today:
120
yesterday:
179
Total:
1,001,216

Articles about Careers

Egg Giant National Food to Pay $650,000 To Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

Employer Failed to Stop Supervisor's Sexual Demands, Retaliated Against Workers Who Spoke Out, Federal Agency Charged

SEATTLE - National Food Corporation, a major supplier of eggs to the Pacific Northwestern and Midwestern United States and East Asia with headquarters in Everett, Wash., will pay $650,000 to five workers and provide other relief to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.

The EEOC's suit charged that a supervisor at National Food's egg farm in Lind, Wash., repeatedly demanded sexual favors from a female laborer, who worked alone in a henhouse, in order to keep her job. Taking advantage of her isolated workplace, the supervisor would physically grab the barn worker and demand sex from her on a weekly basis, from 2003 to 2010. The EEOC also alleged that when her co-workers raised complaints about sexual harassment to company management, they were fired or forced out of their jobs.

"For almost seven years, I tried to just survive these demands from my boss, because I needed to support my mother and my daughter," said the worker. "I hope my case will help other workers to speak out against sexual harassment. It's important to know that that you have a right to say no to sexual demands even from a supervisor, and that the law protects you when you protest harassment."

Sexual harassment violates Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC filed the lawsuit (EEOC v. National Food Corp., CV-12-00550-TOR.) in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, after an investigation conducted by EEOC investigator Richard Hernandez, and first attempting to reach voluntary settlement out of court. The workers were also represented by private counsel from Columbia Legal Services and MacDonald Hogue & Bayless.

"This lawsuit is another in an unfortunate pattern of employers taking advantage of female agricultural workers who often work in isolation and are unaware of their rights," said David Lopez, general counsel of the EEOC. "It is one of the EEOC's national priorities to combat discrimination against vulnerable workers, and we hope that this settlement sends a message to other employers that they need to be vigilant to prevent sexual harassment and other abuse."

Under the consent decree resolving this lawsuit, National Food has also agreed to issue EEO policies in English and Spanish to employees throughout Eastern Washington and South Dakota; institute changes to ensure that its complaint procedures are accessible; and train its management and to hold supervisors accountable for any discrimination, harassment or retaliation under their watch. In addition, National Foods will report harassment complaints to the EEOC for four years, and will not rehire the alleged harasser in any capacity.

"All workers have the right to a workplace free of harassment," said EEOC San Francisco Regional Attorney William R. Tamayo, whose office has jurisdiction over Washington State. "We are glad that National Foods worked with the Commission to reach this resolution without going through lengthy and costly litigation. The settlement will provide significant relief for individuals EEOC believes were victims of egregious harassment and retaliation. The changes in company practices and the discharge of the harasser will hopefully create a safe place for employees."

"Abuse of power should not occur in the workplace, whether in a white-collar office or on an isolated farm," said Michael Baldonado, director of the EEOC's San Francisco District Office. "The steps that National Food has agreed to should send a clear message that sexual harassment and retaliation will not be tolerated."

This case fits within two of the six national priorities identified by the Commission's Strategic Enforcement Plan (SEP): protecting vulnerable workers who may be less familiar with their rights under equal employment laws, and addressing workplace harassment through systemic enforcement and targeted outreach.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Additional information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.

 

http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/5-16-13.cfm

No. Subject Date Views
31 Joe-Ryan Enterprises to Pay $15K to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit 2013.06.08 1711
» Egg Giant National Food to Pay $650,000 to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit 2013.05.26 1714
29 Race/Color Discrimination 2013.05.26 1729
28 Time off to Vote Notices - Employers must post the employee notice 10 days before a statewide election - form attached 2012.07.07 1735
27 Age Discrimination 2012.08.18 1739
26 FSA의 두가지 Types: Medical Expenses & Dependent Care Expenses 2012.02.19 1772
25 SDI - 몸이 아파서 직장을 못나가게 되었을때, 무슨 혜택이 있을까? 2011.11.21 1782
24 OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Rights & Responsibilities - Employee 2013.05.31 1783
23 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 1787
22 EEOC And Cooper University Health Care Reach Accord on Reasonable Accommodation Issues 2013.09.04 1792
21 BASF Corp. to Pay $500,000 to settle EEOC Retaliation Lawsuit Against Cognis 2013.06.08 1828
20 What is FSA? 2012.02.19 1869
19 Stone Pony Pizza Sued for Race Discrimination 2013.06.08 1897
18 OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Rights & Responsibilities - Employer 2013.05.31 1956
17 Notice Concerning The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Amendments Act of 2008 2012.08.04 1964
16 Sexual Harassment Charges 2012.01.15 1993
15 Benefit to employee 2012.08.18 2086
14 WHO IS ELIGIBLE FOR FMLA/CFRA LEAVE 2012.08.18 2155
13 EEOC란 무엇을 하는 곳인가? 2013.09.02 2174
12 How to file a claim with the Bureau of Field Enforcement (BOFE) 2013.02.10 2196
11 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 2) ADMINISTRATIVE Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 2319
10 Reduced Wages - 몸이 아파서 제대로 일을 하지 못하였습니까? 2012.11.22 2372
9 Age Discrimination - 몇살부터 차별을 하는것을 의미할까요? 2013.06.05 2374
8 FMLA 관련 중요한 날짜 계산 방식 2012.08.18 2484
7 The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 2013.06.05 2856
6 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 3) PROFESSIONAL Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 3691
5 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 6072
4 Wage Order No. 6 - CA 2012.02.22 6345
3 Wage Order - summary : Wage Order 몇번을 봐야 하는지? 2012.02.25 12154
2 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 18128
1 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 43855