today:
40
yesterday:
46
Total:
998,739

Articles about Careers

BASF Corporation to Pay $500,000 to Settle EEOC Retaliation Lawsuit Against Cognis

Employees Were Forced to Sacrifice Their Civil Rights or Their Jobs, Agency Charged

URBANA, Ill. - BASF Corporation will pay $500,000 to settle a retaliation lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against Cognis Corporation, the EEOC announced today.  BASF acquired Cognis in 2010.

In its lawsuit, the EEOC charged - and the judge later held - that Cognis retaliated against a longtime employee at its Kankakee, Ill., facility in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  Cognis had required that employee, as a condition of his continued employment, to sign a "last-chance agreement."  That agreement prohibited the employee from filing charges of discrimination with the EEOC, even for events that had yet to occur.  When the employee informed Cognis that he did not want to be bound by the agreement out of concern about its effect on his civil rights, Cognis fired him.

The EEOC brought suit (EEOC v. Cognis Corp., 10-CV-2182, C.D. Ill.) in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois after first attempting to resolve the case through its conciliation process.

Chief U.S. District Judge Michael P. McCuskey held in May 2012 that the employee's termination constituted unlawful retaliation in violation of Title VII.  With that issue decided, the only question left for trial was the extent of the employee's damages.

The EEOC's lawsuit also alleged that Cognis retaliated against five additional employees by forcing those employees to make a similarly illegal choice.  Those employees chose to sign a last chance agreement that stripped them of their right to file charges and seek relief for future discriminatory conduct - rather than be terminated.  By settling the lawsuit, BASF has opted not to continue defending against those allegations.

Judge McCuskey entered a consent decree resolving the lawsuit on January 25, 2013.  The decree provides monetary relief to the victims and requires BASF to report all employee retaliation complaints under Title VII at the Kankakee facility to the EEOC for the next two years.  BASF must also train a specified group of its employees on prohibited retaliation under the federal employment nondiscrimination laws and adopt a new policy informing employees of their right to oppose unlawful discrimination without fear of retaliation.  Furthermore, BASF agreed that it would not require the recipients of monetary relief to keep confidential the allegations and facts underlying the charge, to waive their rights to file a charge with any government agency, or to refrain from reapplying for work with the company.

"The EEOC has an inherent, institutional interest in maintaining open lines of communication with people who believe they may be victims of discrimination," said John Hendrickson, the EEOC's regional attorney in Chicago.  "That is why employers who attempt to break that line of communication by dissuading employees from filing EEOC charges are breaking the law.  Courts get that, and with this case, we hope more employers will as well."

EEOC's Chicago District Director John Rowe, added, "Cognis presented the victims in this case with a terrible, illegal choice: lose your job or lose your civil rights.  Under the law, no worker has to make that kind of choice.  Employers would be better served by working to ensure that their employees are free from discrimination, rather than threatening their workers with termination in an effort to make sure that employees don't complain."

The EEOC's litigation team was led by Supervisory Trial Attorney Gregory M. Gochanour and Trial Attorneys Deborah Hamilton and Brad Fiorito of the Chicago District Office.

Cognis was acquired in December 2010 by BASF, a multinational chemical company.  According to the most recent information available on the BASF website, BASF Corporation has approximately 16,000 employees in North America and in 2011 had sales of $20 billion.

EEOC is responsible for enforcing federal laws prohibiting discrimination.  The EEOC's Chicago District Office is responsible for processing discrimination charges, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litigation in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and North and South Dakota, with Area Offices in Milwaukee and Minneapolis. 

 

Further information about the EEOC is available at www.eeoc.gov.

No. Subject Date Views
281 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 43855
280 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 18128
279 Wage Order - summary : Wage Order 몇번을 봐야 하는지? 2012.02.25 12154
278 Wage Order No. 6 - CA 2012.02.22 6345
277 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 6072
276 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 3) PROFESSIONAL Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 3690
275 The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 2013.06.05 2856
274 Age Discrimination - 몇살부터 차별을 하는것을 의미할까요? 2013.06.05 2374
273 FMLA 관련 중요한 날짜 계산 방식 2012.08.18 2351
272 Reduced Wages - 몸이 아파서 제대로 일을 하지 못하였습니까? 2012.11.22 2340
271 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 2) ADMINISTRATIVE Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 2318
270 How to file a claim with the Bureau of Field Enforcement (BOFE) 2013.02.10 2196
269 EEOC란 무엇을 하는 곳인가? 2013.09.02 2174
268 WHO IS ELIGIBLE FOR FMLA/CFRA LEAVE 2012.08.18 2124
267 Sexual Harassment Charges 2012.01.15 1993
266 Notice Concerning The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Amendments Act of 2008 2012.08.04 1964
265 OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Rights & Responsibilities - Employer 2013.05.31 1956
264 Benefit to employee 2012.08.18 1956
263 Stone Pony Pizza Sued for Race Discrimination 2013.06.08 1897
262 What is FSA? 2012.02.19 1868
» BASF Corp. to Pay $500,000 to settle EEOC Retaliation Lawsuit Against Cognis 2013.06.08 1828
260 EEOC And Cooper University Health Care Reach Accord on Reasonable Accommodation Issues 2013.09.04 1792
259 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 1787
258 OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Rights & Responsibilities - Employee 2013.05.31 1783
257 SDI - 몸이 아파서 직장을 못나가게 되었을때, 무슨 혜택이 있을까? 2011.11.21 1782
256 FSA의 두가지 Types: Medical Expenses & Dependent Care Expenses 2012.02.19 1771
255 Age Discrimination 2012.08.18 1739
254 Time off to Vote Notices - Employers must post the employee notice 10 days before a statewide election - form attached 2012.07.07 1735
253 Race/Color Discrimination 2013.05.26 1729
252 Egg Giant National Food to Pay $650,000 to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit 2013.05.26 1714
251 Joe-Ryan Enterprises to Pay $15K to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit 2013.06.08 1711
250 Panda Express Agrees to Early Settlement with EEOC to Resolve Sexual Harassment Suit 2013.06.08 1699
249 $7 Billion Lost in payroll tax revenue - President Obama's 2010 Budget estimated for independent contractor misclassification 2012.03.10 1686
248 Remedies For Employment Discrimination 2012.03.17 1658
247 AT&T to Pay Quarter Million Dollars to Settle EEOC Agen Disrimination Suit 2013.09.02 1646
246 OSHA - Sec. 17. Penalties 2012.02.26 1623
245 FSA( Flexible Spending Account ) Grace Period 2012.02.18 1615
244 Overtime 수당은 누가 언제 받을 수 있을까요? 2011.11.27 1608
243 $22.5 Million Verdict Reversed Where Employer Admitted Its Vicarious Liability For Employee’s Negligence 2013.05.28 1599
242 FSA - What is the tax advantage of a Section 125 plan? 구체적으로 세금 혜텍이란 어떤것인가? 2012.02.19 1584
241 Definition of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Right Act (CFRA) 2012.08.18 1583
240 Employee vs Independent Contractor - IRS Guideline 2012.03.10 1575
239 OSHA - Accident Investigation 2012.02.26 1574
238 $192,500-EEOC settles Sex harassment and Retaliation Suit Against Grace Episcopal Church 2013.05.26 1558
237 FSA - Employer로서 주의할 사항은? 2012.02.19 1526
236 No Such Thing as a Free Lunch: ConocoPhillips to pay $15.5 Million to Settle Meal Break Lawsuit 2013.03.03 1502
235 Mississippi Holiday Inn Franchisee Sued by EEOC for Pregnancy Discrimination 2013.09.02 1492
234 OSHA - Health and Safety Standards 2012.02.26 1471
233 AT&T Workers Claim Lunch Break Violations 2013.03.03 1461
232 OSHA - Sec. 3. Definitions 2012.02.26 1460