today:
92
yesterday:
148
Total:
999,228

Articles about Careers

Egg Giant National Food to Pay $650,000 To Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

Employer Failed to Stop Supervisor's Sexual Demands, Retaliated Against Workers Who Spoke Out, Federal Agency Charged

SEATTLE - National Food Corporation, a major supplier of eggs to the Pacific Northwestern and Midwestern United States and East Asia with headquarters in Everett, Wash., will pay $650,000 to five workers and provide other relief to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.

The EEOC's suit charged that a supervisor at National Food's egg farm in Lind, Wash., repeatedly demanded sexual favors from a female laborer, who worked alone in a henhouse, in order to keep her job. Taking advantage of her isolated workplace, the supervisor would physically grab the barn worker and demand sex from her on a weekly basis, from 2003 to 2010. The EEOC also alleged that when her co-workers raised complaints about sexual harassment to company management, they were fired or forced out of their jobs.

"For almost seven years, I tried to just survive these demands from my boss, because I needed to support my mother and my daughter," said the worker. "I hope my case will help other workers to speak out against sexual harassment. It's important to know that that you have a right to say no to sexual demands even from a supervisor, and that the law protects you when you protest harassment."

Sexual harassment violates Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC filed the lawsuit (EEOC v. National Food Corp., CV-12-00550-TOR.) in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, after an investigation conducted by EEOC investigator Richard Hernandez, and first attempting to reach voluntary settlement out of court. The workers were also represented by private counsel from Columbia Legal Services and MacDonald Hogue & Bayless.

"This lawsuit is another in an unfortunate pattern of employers taking advantage of female agricultural workers who often work in isolation and are unaware of their rights," said David Lopez, general counsel of the EEOC. "It is one of the EEOC's national priorities to combat discrimination against vulnerable workers, and we hope that this settlement sends a message to other employers that they need to be vigilant to prevent sexual harassment and other abuse."

Under the consent decree resolving this lawsuit, National Food has also agreed to issue EEO policies in English and Spanish to employees throughout Eastern Washington and South Dakota; institute changes to ensure that its complaint procedures are accessible; and train its management and to hold supervisors accountable for any discrimination, harassment or retaliation under their watch. In addition, National Foods will report harassment complaints to the EEOC for four years, and will not rehire the alleged harasser in any capacity.

"All workers have the right to a workplace free of harassment," said EEOC San Francisco Regional Attorney William R. Tamayo, whose office has jurisdiction over Washington State. "We are glad that National Foods worked with the Commission to reach this resolution without going through lengthy and costly litigation. The settlement will provide significant relief for individuals EEOC believes were victims of egregious harassment and retaliation. The changes in company practices and the discharge of the harasser will hopefully create a safe place for employees."

"Abuse of power should not occur in the workplace, whether in a white-collar office or on an isolated farm," said Michael Baldonado, director of the EEOC's San Francisco District Office. "The steps that National Food has agreed to should send a clear message that sexual harassment and retaliation will not be tolerated."

This case fits within two of the six national priorities identified by the Commission's Strategic Enforcement Plan (SEP): protecting vulnerable workers who may be less familiar with their rights under equal employment laws, and addressing workplace harassment through systemic enforcement and targeted outreach.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Additional information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.

 

http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/5-16-13.cfm

No. Subject Date Views
31 Paystub에 Social Security Number를 Full로 사용하는것이 법에 저촉이 될까? 2013.03.03 1210
30 Race/Color Discrimination 2013.05.26 1729
29 $192,500-EEOC settles Sex harassment and Retaliation Suit Against Grace Episcopal Church 2013.05.26 1558
» Egg Giant National Food to Pay $650,000 to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit 2013.05.26 1714
27 EPLI-Employers face a growing multitude of serious employment practices liability (EPL) exposures 2013.05.28 1100
26 $22.5 Million Verdict Reversed Where Employer Admitted Its Vicarious Liability For Employee’s Negligence 2013.05.28 1599
25 OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Rights & Responsibilities - Employer 2013.05.31 1956
24 OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Rights & Responsibilities - Employee 2013.05.31 1783
23 Age Discrimination - 몇살부터 차별을 하는것을 의미할까요? 2013.06.05 2374
22 The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 2013.06.05 2856
21 주정부에 내는 세금과 주정부 혜택은 어떤 관련이 있을까? 2013.06.08 1271
20 Joe-Ryan Enterprises to Pay $15K to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit 2013.06.08 1711
19 Panda Express Agrees to Early Settlement with EEOC to Resolve Sexual Harassment Suit 2013.06.08 1699
18 Stone Pony Pizza Sued for Race Discrimination 2013.06.08 1897
17 BASF Corp. to Pay $500,000 to settle EEOC Retaliation Lawsuit Against Cognis 2013.06.08 1828
16 AT&T to Pay Quarter Million Dollars to Settle EEOC Agen Disrimination Suit 2013.09.02 1646
15 Mississippi Holiday Inn Franchisee Sued by EEOC for Pregnancy Discrimination 2013.09.02 1492
14 EEOC란 무엇을 하는 곳인가? 2013.09.02 2174
13 EEOC And Cooper University Health Care Reach Accord on Reasonable Accommodation Issues 2013.09.04 1792
12 Newly Hired or Promoted Managers - sexual harassment 주시고 계신가요? 2013.11.25 912
11 FLSA Status - 어떻게 Exempt인지 Non Exempt인지 구분하나요? 단계별 test를 해보세요. 2013.11.25 1078
10 McDonald's Restaurants of California, Inc. Settles EEOC Religious Discrimination Lawsuit 2013.12.27 1455
9 Questions and Answers for Small Employers on Employer Liability for Harassment by Supervisors 2013.12.27 1088
8 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 1) EXECUTIVE Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 1144
7 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 2) ADMINISTRATIVE Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 2318
6 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 3) PROFESSIONAL Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 3690
5 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 4) COMPUTER Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 1172
4 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 5) OUTSIDE SALES Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 1169
3 연령 차별' 해고 60대에 2600만달러 배상 2014.03.01 1323
2 Unemployment Benefits After Moving Out of State 2015.04.29 1287
1 Employment Law Basics 2016.01.14 927