today:
144
yesterday:
148
Total:
999,280

Articles about Careers

BASF Corporation to Pay $500,000 to Settle EEOC Retaliation Lawsuit Against Cognis

Employees Were Forced to Sacrifice Their Civil Rights or Their Jobs, Agency Charged

URBANA, Ill. - BASF Corporation will pay $500,000 to settle a retaliation lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against Cognis Corporation, the EEOC announced today.  BASF acquired Cognis in 2010.

In its lawsuit, the EEOC charged - and the judge later held - that Cognis retaliated against a longtime employee at its Kankakee, Ill., facility in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  Cognis had required that employee, as a condition of his continued employment, to sign a "last-chance agreement."  That agreement prohibited the employee from filing charges of discrimination with the EEOC, even for events that had yet to occur.  When the employee informed Cognis that he did not want to be bound by the agreement out of concern about its effect on his civil rights, Cognis fired him.

The EEOC brought suit (EEOC v. Cognis Corp., 10-CV-2182, C.D. Ill.) in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois after first attempting to resolve the case through its conciliation process.

Chief U.S. District Judge Michael P. McCuskey held in May 2012 that the employee's termination constituted unlawful retaliation in violation of Title VII.  With that issue decided, the only question left for trial was the extent of the employee's damages.

The EEOC's lawsuit also alleged that Cognis retaliated against five additional employees by forcing those employees to make a similarly illegal choice.  Those employees chose to sign a last chance agreement that stripped them of their right to file charges and seek relief for future discriminatory conduct - rather than be terminated.  By settling the lawsuit, BASF has opted not to continue defending against those allegations.

Judge McCuskey entered a consent decree resolving the lawsuit on January 25, 2013.  The decree provides monetary relief to the victims and requires BASF to report all employee retaliation complaints under Title VII at the Kankakee facility to the EEOC for the next two years.  BASF must also train a specified group of its employees on prohibited retaliation under the federal employment nondiscrimination laws and adopt a new policy informing employees of their right to oppose unlawful discrimination without fear of retaliation.  Furthermore, BASF agreed that it would not require the recipients of monetary relief to keep confidential the allegations and facts underlying the charge, to waive their rights to file a charge with any government agency, or to refrain from reapplying for work with the company.

"The EEOC has an inherent, institutional interest in maintaining open lines of communication with people who believe they may be victims of discrimination," said John Hendrickson, the EEOC's regional attorney in Chicago.  "That is why employers who attempt to break that line of communication by dissuading employees from filing EEOC charges are breaking the law.  Courts get that, and with this case, we hope more employers will as well."

EEOC's Chicago District Director John Rowe, added, "Cognis presented the victims in this case with a terrible, illegal choice: lose your job or lose your civil rights.  Under the law, no worker has to make that kind of choice.  Employers would be better served by working to ensure that their employees are free from discrimination, rather than threatening their workers with termination in an effort to make sure that employees don't complain."

The EEOC's litigation team was led by Supervisory Trial Attorney Gregory M. Gochanour and Trial Attorneys Deborah Hamilton and Brad Fiorito of the Chicago District Office.

Cognis was acquired in December 2010 by BASF, a multinational chemical company.  According to the most recent information available on the BASF website, BASF Corporation has approximately 16,000 employees in North America and in 2011 had sales of $20 billion.

EEOC is responsible for enforcing federal laws prohibiting discrimination.  The EEOC's Chicago District Office is responsible for processing discrimination charges, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litigation in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and North and South Dakota, with Area Offices in Milwaukee and Minneapolis. 

 

Further information about the EEOC is available at www.eeoc.gov.

No. Subject Date Views
31 Paystub에 Social Security Number를 Full로 사용하는것이 법에 저촉이 될까? 2013.03.03 1210
30 Race/Color Discrimination 2013.05.26 1729
29 $192,500-EEOC settles Sex harassment and Retaliation Suit Against Grace Episcopal Church 2013.05.26 1558
28 Egg Giant National Food to Pay $650,000 to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit 2013.05.26 1714
27 EPLI-Employers face a growing multitude of serious employment practices liability (EPL) exposures 2013.05.28 1100
26 $22.5 Million Verdict Reversed Where Employer Admitted Its Vicarious Liability For Employee’s Negligence 2013.05.28 1599
25 OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Rights & Responsibilities - Employer 2013.05.31 1956
24 OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Rights & Responsibilities - Employee 2013.05.31 1783
23 Age Discrimination - 몇살부터 차별을 하는것을 의미할까요? 2013.06.05 2374
22 The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 2013.06.05 2856
21 주정부에 내는 세금과 주정부 혜택은 어떤 관련이 있을까? 2013.06.08 1271
20 Joe-Ryan Enterprises to Pay $15K to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit 2013.06.08 1711
19 Panda Express Agrees to Early Settlement with EEOC to Resolve Sexual Harassment Suit 2013.06.08 1699
18 Stone Pony Pizza Sued for Race Discrimination 2013.06.08 1897
» BASF Corp. to Pay $500,000 to settle EEOC Retaliation Lawsuit Against Cognis 2013.06.08 1828
16 AT&T to Pay Quarter Million Dollars to Settle EEOC Agen Disrimination Suit 2013.09.02 1646
15 Mississippi Holiday Inn Franchisee Sued by EEOC for Pregnancy Discrimination 2013.09.02 1492
14 EEOC란 무엇을 하는 곳인가? 2013.09.02 2174
13 EEOC And Cooper University Health Care Reach Accord on Reasonable Accommodation Issues 2013.09.04 1792
12 Newly Hired or Promoted Managers - sexual harassment 주시고 계신가요? 2013.11.25 912
11 FLSA Status - 어떻게 Exempt인지 Non Exempt인지 구분하나요? 단계별 test를 해보세요. 2013.11.25 1078
10 McDonald's Restaurants of California, Inc. Settles EEOC Religious Discrimination Lawsuit 2013.12.27 1455
9 Questions and Answers for Small Employers on Employer Liability for Harassment by Supervisors 2013.12.27 1088
8 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 1) EXECUTIVE Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 1144
7 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 2) ADMINISTRATIVE Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 2318
6 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 3) PROFESSIONAL Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 3690
5 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 4) COMPUTER Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 1172
4 FLSA Status - Exempt vs. Non-Exempt? -- 5) OUTSIDE SALES Exemption 충족요건 2014.01.02 1169
3 연령 차별' 해고 60대에 2600만달러 배상 2014.03.01 1323
2 Unemployment Benefits After Moving Out of State 2015.04.29 1287
1 Employment Law Basics 2016.01.14 927