today:
42
yesterday:
179
Total:
1,001,138

증권

California Looks to Reduce Weekly Work Hours to 32

admin 2022.04.11 20:37 Views : 414

The California State flag flies outside City Hall, in Los Angeles, Calif., on Jan. 27, 2017. (Mark Ralston/AFP via Getty Images)

California legislators proposed a new bill that would allow big company employees to work fewer hours in a week without losing any income, which critics said would become a “job killer.”

Assembly Bill 2932, introduced by Assembly Members Cristina Garcia (D-Bell Gardens) and Evan Low (D-San Jose) in February, would require companies with more than 500 employees to reduce their weekly work hours from 40 to 32 hours—from the regular 5 to 4 workdays a week—and those who work more than 32 hours a week would be considered as working overtime and should be compensated at a rate of 1.5 times the regular pay rate for the extra hours.

If signed into law, California will become the first state in the United States to reduce regular weekly workdays to 4 days.

“There have been so many societal advances in the last 100 years,” Garcia said in a statement emailed to The Epoch Times. “It doesn’t make sense that we are still holding onto a work schedule that served the industrial revolution. It’s long overdue that this progress is shared with our workforce which deserves an improved quality of life.”

Garcia said working fewer hours could improve employees’ productivity and wellbeing, and “the pandemic and the Great Resignation have made it crystal clear the time [for this change] is now.”

The bill also requires “the compensation rate of pay at 32 hours to reflect the previous compensation rate of pay at 40 hours” and “prohibits an employer from reducing an employee’s regular rate of pay as a result of this reduced hourly workweek requirement.”

It is unclear whether the “regular rate of pay” in the bill’s original language is referring to an employee’s original hourly wage or the total compensation.

“This language may be interpreted as requiring the employer to pay the employee the same total compensation that they are presently earning at 40 hours for 32 hours of work,” Ashley Hoffman, policy advocate at the California Chamber of Commerce (CalChamber), wrote in an April 6 letter to Low.

If this is the case, Hoffman explained, an employee originally making $20 per hour would be making $400 a week for 32 hours worked, equaling $25 an hour (25 percent increase) and leading to an overtime pay rate of $37.5 an hour (87.5 percent increase).

Calling the bill a “job killer,” CalChamber stated that businesses are still recovering from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, and many companies have already been cutting down their current work hours and job openings.

“Instead of imposing new costs on employers, the Legislature should reform California’s unnecessarily rigid wage and hour laws to allow employees flexibility in their weekly schedules that would better align with the modern workplace,” the chamber’s letter read.

June Cutter, an attorney and small business owner who is running for California State Assembly District 76, also opposed the bill, saying the change would have an adverse effect on both employees and employers.

“Legislators who have never operated a business (or perhaps never even held a private sector job) have no idea what the real implications of this bill will be,” Cutter wrote on Twitter. “People will lose wages, people will lose jobs, small businesses will fold.”

The bill is currently under review by the Labor and Employment Committee.

Assemblyman Evan Low did not respond to a request for comment by press deadline.

No. Subject Date Views
158 Tesla (TSLA) Stock file 2020.12.16 56
157 12/24/2020 file 2020.12.24 338
156 Dow Jones Industrial Average file 2020.12.24 218
155 Tesla, Inc. 2020.12.24 555
154 Elon Musk 2020.12.24 107
153 Tesla To Enter India Early Next Year, Transport Minister Confirms 2020.12.28 97
152 NYSE Begins to Delist Chinese Telecom Giants in Compliance With Trump’s Order 2021.01.02 114
151 21 best retirement stocks for an income-rich 2021 2021.01.30 91
150 TD(Securities with trading restrictions) 2021.01.31 63
149 Activision Investors Applaud Q4 Report 2021.02.05 131
148 Tesla Gets A Street High $1,200 Price Target 2021.02.06 123
147 Why did Tesla buy bitcoin? 2021.02.09 67
146 Petco poised for growth after business shift to pet wellness from pet food 2021.02.09 41
145 Not Just Bitcoin, Paypal's Vision Involves Central Bank Digital Currencies Too: What You Need To Know 2021.02.11 68
144 Why Retro And Mid-Core Gaming Is Liquid Media's Sweet Spot 2021.02.11 79
143 Elon Musk Plans For Tesla Roadster To Be Able To Hover 6 Feet In The Air 2021.02.12 57
142 Tesla Denies Development Of $25,000 Model 2 Vehicle In China: cnEVpost 2021.02.15 59
141 New Tesla Roadster Patent Shows Wild Windshield Wiper Design 2021.02.15 5622
140 New Bill Could Net More Tesla, Ford And GM EV Buyers A $7,000 Tax Credit 2021.02.15 1299
139 Tesla May Have Already Made More In Profits From Bitcoin Than Electric Vehicles 2021.02.16 75
138 Tesla's Unusual Options Activity 2021.02.17 105
137 Melvin Capital boss Gabe Plotkin is a bad guy 2021.02.18 95
136 Tesla, PG&E's Giant Battery Pack Project In California Is Almost Finished: Video 2021.02.22 114
135 Cathie Wood's ARK Invest Posts Fund Purchases For Monday, Feb. 22, 2021: DCYHF, FB, OPEN, SURF, RPTX, REGN, EXAS, CMLF, SGFY, U, TXG, TWTR, TSLA, SPOT, PYPL, BEAM, FATE, RAVN, EXPC 2021.02.22 1158
134 Why Tesla Took Off Standard Range Model Y From Its Offerings 2021.02.23 84
133 Billionaire investor Ron Baron’s firm sold 1.8 million Tesla shares 2021.03.04 144
132 TSLA CALL OPTION $700.00 strike March 26, 2021. 2021.03.22 209
131 Jim Cramer has some thoughts on the markets. 2021.03.22 42
130 Why Tesla Stock Fell Sharply on Friday 2021.03.26 40
129 Financial performance - TESLA 2021.03.29 63