today:
46
yesterday:
148
Total:
999,182

Articles about Careers

PRESS RELEASE
11-23-09

 

우리가 흔히 가서 먹는 Pancake House IHOP의 EEOC Sexual Harassment Case입니다.

10대의 2명의 Waitress들과 Assistant  Manager사이에서 발생된 건으로, 희생자의 complaint 가 충분하지 않았던 case 였지만, 이를 근거로 terminate되었던 waitress는 벌과금조로 $100,000의 배상금과 $4000의 보상액이 정해졌고, 이 사건에 비하여 미미하였던 다른 한명에게는 $1000의 보상액이 최종판결로 나왔습니다. 2006년도에 발생되어 claim이 들어와서 3여년이 걸쳐 치열하게 싸운 결과,  2009년 11월에 최종 판결이 나왔지만, IHOP이 Appeal를 결정했기 때문에, 또 얼마나 오랜시간 더 기나긴 법적공방을 계속할지는 모르겠습니다.

 

이상의 Case와 마찬가지로, 일단 법적 소송건으로 번진다면, 이로 인한 변호사 비용, 각종 court에 끌려 다녀야 하는 시간들, 회사의 이미지 실추등, 여러가지 많은 요인들을 생각한다면, 보다 철저한 준비와 실행, complaint가 들어왔을때 얼마나 철저하게 신속하게 해결해 주느냐가 관점이라고 하겠습니다.

 

유비무환!! 잘 준비하시어 크고작은 법적소송에서 벗어나심으로, 정말 중요한 기업으로서의 이윤 활동에 전념하시어 꼭 성공하시기를 바랍니다.

Federal Jury Awards $105,000 in EEOC Sexual Harassment Case Against Racine IHOP

Verdict for Federal Agency on Behalf of Two Teenaged Servers Who Were Verbally and Physically Harassed

MILWAUKEE – The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced today that a federal jury in Milwaukee has returned a $105,000 verdict following a four-day sexual harassment trial in a sexual harassment case brought by the agency.

The jury’s verdict awarded an aggregate of $5,000 to two teenagers who worked at a Racine, Wis., IHOP restaurant who, the EEOC alleged, were sexually harassed by their assistant manager, who subjected them to sexual propositions, groping and hair-pulling. In addition, the jury found that the IHOP had acted recklessly with respect to one of the servers and awarded her $100,000 in punitive damages. The EEOC said that punitive damages may be awarded by juries to punish such conduct and to discourage it in the future.

The IHOP at which the servers worked, and where they were harassed, was owned by Salauddin Janmohammed, and managed by a management consulting firm, Flipmeastack, owned by his wife. In defending the case, the IHOP contended that the restaurant had a strong policy against sexual harassment and that the victim’s complaints about the harassment were not sufficient -- defenses which the jury apparently rejected.

The case, captioned EEOC v. Management Hospitality of Racine, Inc.; Flipmeastack, Inc. and Salauddin Janmohammed, E.D. Wis. No. 06-C-0715, was filed by the EEOC in 2006, and presided over by Judge Lynn Adelman. Management Hospitality of Racine was one of approximately 20 IHOP restaurants located in Wisconsin, Illinois and Iowa owned by Janmohammed, and managed by Flipmeastack. The jury returned its verdict on Thursday, November 19.

The EEOC was represented at trial by Trial Attorneys Brain Tyndall of Milwaukee and Nicholas Pladson of Minneapolis, under the supervision of EEOC Chicago District Associate Regional Attorney Jean Kamp.

Regional Attorney John C. Hendrickson of the EEOC’s Chicago District said, “The trial and the verdict in this case should send a couple of very clear signals. The first is that, although the EEOC resolves many cases by consent decree, we are always ready to take cases to trial. The second is that when we do take sexual harassment cases to trial, juries do not shy away from requiring employers to pay large damage awards.”

EEOC Senior Trial Attorney Brian Tyndall added, “We’re proud to have worked with the two women in this case, who were teenagers at the time of the harassment. It’s never easy to stand up in the face or harassment, especially if you’re young and you really need your job. Nor is it easy to go through the rigors of litigation for a period of years. But these women did that, and because of them and this case, women will have more equal opportunity while working at IHOP and elsewhere in the restaurant industry in Wisconsin.”

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the EEOC is available on the agency’s web site at www.eeoc.gov.

The EEOC Chicago District Office is responsible for processing charges of discrimination, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litigation in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and North and South Dakota, with Area Offices in Milwaukee and Minneapolis.

 

Resources: http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/11-23-09.cfm

No. Subject Date Views
281 Wage Order No. 1 - CA 2012.02.22 302
280 Wage Order No. 2 - CA 2012.02.22 305
279 Wage Order No. 7 - CA 2012.02.22 316
278 Wage Order No. 9 - CA 2012.02.22 316
277 Wage Order No. 3 - CA 2012.02.22 317
276 Wage Order No. 8 - CA 2012.02.22 318
275 Wage Order No. 10 - CA 2012.02.22 318
274 Wage Order No. 5- CA 2012.02.22 324
273 FMLA - Basic Leave Entitlement 2012.01.15 340
272 What's the Minimum Wage in CA? 나는 Min Wage를 받고 있는가? 2011.11.27 343
271 What is FMLA? 2012.01.15 344
270 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 359
269 FMLA - Military Family Leave Entitlements 2012.01.15 362
268 Pay Notices Required to be Provided New Employees as of 1/1/2012 2011.12.18 364
» Federal Jury Awards $105K in EEOC Sexual Harassment Case Against Racine IHOP (Restaurant) 2012.01.03 365
266 Wage Order No. 4 - CA 2012.02.22 367
265 What is DUA (Disaster Unemployment Assistance)? 2011.12.13 368
264 Examples of Conduct that May be Unlawful 2011.12.28 368
263 Wage Order No. 12 - CA 2012.02.22 368
262 FMLA - Benefits and Protections 2012.01.15 370
261 NY State - New Release - effective 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 371
260 Wage Order No. 11 - CA 2012.02.22 372
259 What do I need to file a claim? 2011.12.13 373
258 Misclassification-15 Billion in 2001 - IRS now coming to collect - 안전하신가요? 2012.01.05 375
257 What is the Purpose of I-9 Form? 2011.12.10 379
256 What is Protected Class? 2011.12.27 384
255 You DO NOT complete a Form I-9 for persons who are: 2011.12.10 385
254 FMLA - Employee Responsibilities 2012.01.15 385
253 Who is Eligible for DUA? 2011.12.13 386
252 What Is the Filing Fee? 2011.12.10 391
251 Sexual Harassment- Complaint Procedures 2011.12.31 392
250 I-9 Form: The Rules of Use 2011.12.10 398
249 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 404
248 Examples of a hostile work environment 2011.12.28 406
247 Best Practices for Limiting Employer Liability (가장중요한 대책들입니다.) 2012.01.02 408
246 Wage Order No. 13 - CA 2012.02.22 408
245 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 409
244 FMLA - Eligibility Requirements 2012.01.15 411
243 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 412
242 What is I-9? 2011.12.10 417
241 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 419
240 SB 459: Penalties for employers who misclassify employees as independent contractors. 2011.12.18 421
239 HR - 아무리해도 강조해도 지나치지 않는것!! 2012.01.08 422
238 What is Flexible Spending Account (FSA)? 2011.12.22 424
237 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 426
236 What is Fiduciary Liability Insurance? 2012.01.08 427
235 Wage Order No. 15 - CA 2012.02.22 432
234 SDI - 몸이 아파서 직장을 못나가게 되었을때, 무슨 혜택이 있을까? 2011.11.21 440
233 Wage Order No. 14 - CA 2012.02.22 440
232 401K - Fidelity Bonds 2012.01.08 452