today:
108
yesterday:
179
Total:
1,001,204

Articles about Careers

PRESS RELEASE
11-23-09

 

우리가 흔히 가서 먹는 Pancake House IHOP의 EEOC Sexual Harassment Case입니다.

10대의 2명의 Waitress들과 Assistant  Manager사이에서 발생된 건으로, 희생자의 complaint 가 충분하지 않았던 case 였지만, 이를 근거로 terminate되었던 waitress는 벌과금조로 $100,000의 배상금과 $4000의 보상액이 정해졌고, 이 사건에 비하여 미미하였던 다른 한명에게는 $1000의 보상액이 최종판결로 나왔습니다. 2006년도에 발생되어 claim이 들어와서 3여년이 걸쳐 치열하게 싸운 결과,  2009년 11월에 최종 판결이 나왔지만, IHOP이 Appeal를 결정했기 때문에, 또 얼마나 오랜시간 더 기나긴 법적공방을 계속할지는 모르겠습니다.

 

이상의 Case와 마찬가지로, 일단 법적 소송건으로 번진다면, 이로 인한 변호사 비용, 각종 court에 끌려 다녀야 하는 시간들, 회사의 이미지 실추등, 여러가지 많은 요인들을 생각한다면, 보다 철저한 준비와 실행, complaint가 들어왔을때 얼마나 철저하게 신속하게 해결해 주느냐가 관점이라고 하겠습니다.

 

유비무환!! 잘 준비하시어 크고작은 법적소송에서 벗어나심으로, 정말 중요한 기업으로서의 이윤 활동에 전념하시어 꼭 성공하시기를 바랍니다.

Federal Jury Awards $105,000 in EEOC Sexual Harassment Case Against Racine IHOP

Verdict for Federal Agency on Behalf of Two Teenaged Servers Who Were Verbally and Physically Harassed

MILWAUKEE – The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced today that a federal jury in Milwaukee has returned a $105,000 verdict following a four-day sexual harassment trial in a sexual harassment case brought by the agency.

The jury’s verdict awarded an aggregate of $5,000 to two teenagers who worked at a Racine, Wis., IHOP restaurant who, the EEOC alleged, were sexually harassed by their assistant manager, who subjected them to sexual propositions, groping and hair-pulling. In addition, the jury found that the IHOP had acted recklessly with respect to one of the servers and awarded her $100,000 in punitive damages. The EEOC said that punitive damages may be awarded by juries to punish such conduct and to discourage it in the future.

The IHOP at which the servers worked, and where they were harassed, was owned by Salauddin Janmohammed, and managed by a management consulting firm, Flipmeastack, owned by his wife. In defending the case, the IHOP contended that the restaurant had a strong policy against sexual harassment and that the victim’s complaints about the harassment were not sufficient -- defenses which the jury apparently rejected.

The case, captioned EEOC v. Management Hospitality of Racine, Inc.; Flipmeastack, Inc. and Salauddin Janmohammed, E.D. Wis. No. 06-C-0715, was filed by the EEOC in 2006, and presided over by Judge Lynn Adelman. Management Hospitality of Racine was one of approximately 20 IHOP restaurants located in Wisconsin, Illinois and Iowa owned by Janmohammed, and managed by Flipmeastack. The jury returned its verdict on Thursday, November 19.

The EEOC was represented at trial by Trial Attorneys Brain Tyndall of Milwaukee and Nicholas Pladson of Minneapolis, under the supervision of EEOC Chicago District Associate Regional Attorney Jean Kamp.

Regional Attorney John C. Hendrickson of the EEOC’s Chicago District said, “The trial and the verdict in this case should send a couple of very clear signals. The first is that, although the EEOC resolves many cases by consent decree, we are always ready to take cases to trial. The second is that when we do take sexual harassment cases to trial, juries do not shy away from requiring employers to pay large damage awards.”

EEOC Senior Trial Attorney Brian Tyndall added, “We’re proud to have worked with the two women in this case, who were teenagers at the time of the harassment. It’s never easy to stand up in the face or harassment, especially if you’re young and you really need your job. Nor is it easy to go through the rigors of litigation for a period of years. But these women did that, and because of them and this case, women will have more equal opportunity while working at IHOP and elsewhere in the restaurant industry in Wisconsin.”

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the EEOC is available on the agency’s web site at www.eeoc.gov.

The EEOC Chicago District Office is responsible for processing charges of discrimination, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litigation in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and North and South Dakota, with Area Offices in Milwaukee and Minneapolis.

 

Resources: http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/11-23-09.cfm

No. Subject Date Views
81 Wage Order No. 6 - CA 2012.02.22 6345
80 Wage Order No. 5- CA 2012.02.22 324
79 Wage Order No. 4 - CA 2012.02.22 367
78 Wage Order No. 3 - CA 2012.02.22 317
77 Wage Order No. 2 - CA 2012.02.22 305
76 Wage Order No. 1 - CA 2012.02.22 302
75 OSHA 300 Log Posting 2012.02.18 533
74 CA State - New Hire Requirement - Effective as of 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 1052
73 NY State - New Release - effective 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 371
72 ADA - Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 2012.01.15 554
71 FMLA - Employer Responsibilities 2012.01.15 530
70 FMLA - Employee Responsibilities 2012.01.15 385
69 FMLA - Definition of Serious Health Condition 2012.01.15 518
68 FMLA - Eligibility Requirements 2012.01.15 411
67 FMLA - Benefits and Protections 2012.01.15 370
66 FMLA - Military Family Leave Entitlements 2012.01.15 362
65 FMLA - Basic Leave Entitlement 2012.01.15 340
64 What is FMLA? 2012.01.15 344
63 HR - 아무리해도 강조해도 지나치지 않는것!! 2012.01.08 422
62 EPL Insurances - How to prevent employee lawsuits? 2012.01.08 461
61 Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI) 2012.01.08 732
60 Directors and Officers Liability Insurance (often called D&O) 2012.01.08 534
59 Employee Benefit Liability Insurance 2012.01.08 458
58 401K - Fidelity Bonds 2012.01.08 452
57 What is Fiduciary Liability Insurance? 2012.01.08 427
56 Misclassification-15 Billion in 2001 - IRS now coming to collect - 안전하신가요? 2012.01.05 375
» Federal Jury Awards $105K in EEOC Sexual Harassment Case Against Racine IHOP (Restaurant) 2012.01.03 365
54 Best Practices for Limiting Employer Liability (가장중요한 대책들입니다.) 2012.01.02 408
53 Investigation Interview Protocol for Employee Interview 2011.12.31 455
52 Sexual Harassment- Key Elements of Investigation Procedures 2011.12.31 489
51 Sexual Harassment- Complaint Procedures 2011.12.31 392
50 Liability and Relationships - Office Relationships-Supervisors & Subordinates 2011.12.28 524
49 Examples of a hostile work environment 2011.12.28 406
48 Examples of Conduct that May be Unlawful 2011.12.28 368
47 Sexual Harassment Charges-EEOC & FEPAs Combined: FY 1997 - FY 2010 2011.12.27 528
46 What is Protected Class? 2011.12.27 384
45 Types of Sexual Harassment - Quid Pro Quo/ Hostile Work environment 2011.12.27 505
44 EEOC’s Definition of Sexual Harassment 2011.12.27 622
43 Sexual Harassment - What is the big deal? 2011.12.26 727
42 OSHA Question 2. What is an Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard? 2011.12.24 536
41 OSHA Question 1. What are employers' responsibilities under the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act? 2011.12.24 487
40 About OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) 2011.12.24 584
39 FSA Worksheet - how to save the tax as an Employer and/or an Employee 2011.12.22 593
38 What is Flexible Spending Account (FSA)? 2011.12.22 424
37 Employee vs. Independent Contractor – Seven Tips for Business Owners 2011.12.18 520
36 SB 459: Penalties for employers who misclassify employees as independent contractors. 2011.12.18 421
35 Pay Notices Required to be Provided New Employees as of 1/1/2012 2011.12.18 364
34 직업학교 학비 지원 2011.12.16 519
33 Who is Eligible for DUA? 2011.12.13 386
32 What is DUA (Disaster Unemployment Assistance)? 2011.12.13 368