today:
69
yesterday:
170
Total:
999,375

Articles about Careers

Litigation Cases Article : Love Contract

HRConsultant1 2012.10.22 11:02 Views : 1281

“Office romances pose several potential legal issues for employers, prompting some employers to use "love contracts" to help minimize their liability.

These  "love contracts" should be used to supplement a company's anti-harassment policy, not in place of a well-implemented policy against sexual harassment.

What are the potential legal liabilities of office romances? When a supervisor is dating a subordinate, other workers might claim that the subordinate received preferential treatment in job assignments or pay raises.

Also, if the relationship ends, the subordinate could claim that the relationship was not consensual and that he or she was sexually harassed by the supervisor and/or was the victim of retaliation.

When a dating couple is on the same reporting level, legal problems can also arise. For example, one worker might still have input into the other's performance evaluation or the awarding of bonuses.

Also, when the relationship ends, one worker might create a hostile work environment by giving the other person attention that is no longer welcome, she says.

Given these potential problems and a litigious society, some employers are implementing what are called "love contract" policies, which require dating employees t

A love contract policy should be incorporated into the employee handbook and be "widely disseminated" in the workplace through e-mail and/or a memo announcing the policy, and perhaps even a meeting explaining the policy and why the company is adopting it, she says. It’s also recommended discussing the policy in anti-harassment training programs.

The policy should explain that dating employees have an obligation to tell Human Resources about the relationship. Some employees may be reluctant to do so, particularly if the office romance is an adulterous or same-sex relationship.

To be certain that the policy is applied fairly and consistently, if the company becomes aware of any type of romantic relationship, it is important for someone from HR to approach the couple and ask them to sign a love contract.”

o sign a document outlining expected behavior and specifying that their relationship is consensual.

What to Include in Contracts

There are certain key elements that should be included in love contracts. For example, when employees are on the same reporting level, the contract should contain a statement "that the employees will not seek or accept a position where one reports to the other."

If one of the employees already supervises the other and it is not possible to transfer one of them to another department or worksite, it’s recommended that the supervisor agree "to be permanently removed from any decision-making authority over the subordinate."

In addition, the contract should state that:

  • Any dispute arising from the relationship or contract will be resolved through arbitration.
  • Employees may want to consult an attorney before signing the contract.
  • Dating employees are expected to follow certain guidelines, such as refraining from displays of affection at work or work- related events.
  • Either employee "can end the relationship without fear of work-related retaliation."
  • Dating employees agree to waive their rights to pursue a claim of sexual harassment for any event prior to the signing of the contract.

 

How to Implement the Policy

·         A love contract policy should be incorporated into the employee handbook and be "widely disseminated" in the workplace through e-mail and/or a memo announcing the policy, and perhaps even a meeting explaining the policy and why the company is adopting it, she says. It’s also recommended discussing the policy in anti-harassment training programs.

·         The policy should explain that dating employees have an obligation to tell Human Resources about the relationship. Some employees may be reluctant to do so, particularly if the office romance is an adulterous or same-sex relationship.

·         To be certain that the policy is applied fairly and consistently, if the company becomes aware of any type of romantic relationship, it is important for someone from HR to approach the couple and ask them to sign a love contract.”

No. Subject Date Views
181 EEOC’s Definition of Sexual Harassment 2011.12.27 734
180 Employee vs. Independent Contractor – Seven Tips for Business Owners 2011.12.18 604
179 SB 459: Penalties for employers who misclassify employees as independent contractors. 2011.12.18 612
178 Pay Notices Required to be Provided New Employees as of 1/1/2012 2011.12.18 704
177 Overtime 수당은 누가 언제 받을 수 있을까요? 2011.11.27 651
176 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 669
175 Employee Benefits in US provided by DOL Bureau of Labor Statistics 2011.11.30 625
174 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 6072
173 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 733
172 미국내 회사들의 평균 Holiday는 얼마나 주고 있는것일까? 2011.11.30 710
171 Unpaid Lunch Break & Paid Smoke Breaks? 2011.11.30 702
170 이런 Benefit이 있다면? 2011.11.30 696
169 Rate Your Vacation - 우리회사의 Vacation은 좋은 편인가? Benchmarking해보셔요! 2011.11.30 732
168 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 646
167 Exempt vs Non-Exempt Employees 2011.11.28 660
166 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (스타벅스의 OT관련 법적소송건- 3) 2011.11.28 752
165 Litigation Cases (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 잘못 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건- 2) 2011.11.28 771
164 Litigation Cases - Misclassification (Overtime을 주지 않는 salary로 구분한 경우의 법적 소송건) 2011.11.28 749
163 Misclassification의 경우 Penalty는 얼마나 될까? 2011.11.28 674
162 FLSA Status-직원 급여를 Hourly로 혹은 Salary로 주는것은 회사 재량일까? 2011.11.28 18128
161 NY State - New Release - effective 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 655
160 CA State - New Hire Requirement - Effective as of 1/1/2012 2012.01.15 674
159 Interview Question-Candidates should not be asked - 인터뷰시 하면 안되는 질문들!! 2011.12.26 641
158 Interview Question-Candidates may be asked - 인터뷰시 물어봐도 되는 질문들 2011.12.26 650
157 Hiring Interview할때 범하기 쉬운 5가지 실수 2011.12.26 658
156 Interview Question-Candidates should not be asked - 인터뷰시 하면 안되는 질문들!! 2011.12.06 779
155 Interview Question-Candidates may be asked - 인터뷰시 물어봐도 되는 질문들 2011.12.06 861
154 Common Interviewing Mistakes -인터뷰할 때 가장 범하기 쉬운 실수 5가지!! 2011.12.06 764
153 Employment Law Basics 2016.01.14 927
152 연령 차별' 해고 60대에 2600만달러 배상 2014.03.01 1323
151 McDonald's Restaurants of California, Inc. Settles EEOC Religious Discrimination Lawsuit 2013.12.27 1455
150 EEOC And Cooper University Health Care Reach Accord on Reasonable Accommodation Issues 2013.09.04 1792
149 Mississippi Holiday Inn Franchisee Sued by EEOC for Pregnancy Discrimination 2013.09.02 1492
148 AT&T to Pay Quarter Million Dollars to Settle EEOC Agen Disrimination Suit 2013.09.02 1646
147 BASF Corp. to Pay $500,000 to settle EEOC Retaliation Lawsuit Against Cognis 2013.06.08 1828
146 Stone Pony Pizza Sued for Race Discrimination 2013.06.08 1897
145 Panda Express Agrees to Early Settlement with EEOC to Resolve Sexual Harassment Suit 2013.06.08 1699
144 Joe-Ryan Enterprises to Pay $15K to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit 2013.06.08 1711
143 $22.5 Million Verdict Reversed Where Employer Admitted Its Vicarious Liability For Employee’s Negligence 2013.05.28 1599
142 Egg Giant National Food to Pay $650,000 to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit 2013.05.26 1714
141 $192,500-EEOC settles Sex harassment and Retaliation Suit Against Grace Episcopal Church 2013.05.26 1558
140 No Such Thing as a Free Lunch: ConocoPhillips to pay $15.5 Million to Settle Meal Break Lawsuit 2013.03.03 1502
139 AT&T Workers Claim Lunch Break Violations 2013.03.03 1461
» Article : Love Contract 2012.10.22 1281
137 Fremont Toyota Pays $400,000 to Settle EEOC's Harassment and Retaliation Lawsuit - Allegation 2012.08.19 1459
136 Fremont Toyota Pays $400,000 to Settle EEOC's Harassment and Retaliation Lawsuit -Press Release-08-07-12 2012.08.18 1448
135 Owner of 25 McDonald's Restaurants to Pay $1 Million in EEOC Sexual Harassment Suit 2012.08.04 1324
134 Comfort Inn Oceanfront South Sued By EEOC for Religious Discrimination 2012.08.04 1420
133 Caldwell Freight Lines to Pay $120K to Settle EEOC Race Discrimination Lawsuit 2012.08.04 1240
132 Wrongful Termination Lawsuits on the Rise 2012.07.07 824